PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCMU vs. SOXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCMU vs. SOXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares (QCMU) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCMU achieves a -4.41% return, which is significantly higher than SOXS's -93.36% return.


QCMU

1D
-1.89%
1M
-16.64%
6M
-11.11%
YTD
-4.41%
1Y
3.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SOXS

1D
0.25%
1M
-12.57%
6M
-91.19%
YTD
-93.36%
1Y
-97.03%
3Y*
-86.75%
5Y*
-80.02%
10Y*
-79.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCMU vs. SOXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QCMU and SOXS is -0.60, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

-0.61

The correlation between QCMU and SOXS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.61 to -0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCMU vs. SOXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCMU
QCMU Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
QCMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCMU Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
QCMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCMU Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXS
SOXS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SOXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCMU vs. SOXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares (QCMU) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QCMUSOXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.69

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

-0.99

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.05

-1.44

+1.49

QCMU vs. SOXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCMU Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is higher than the SOXS Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCMU and SOXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QCMU vs. SOXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCMU drawdown since its inception was -59.48%, smaller than the maximum SOXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCMU and SOXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCMUSOXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.48%

-100.00%

+40.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.48%

-97.89%

+38.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.54%

-100.00%

+52.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.01%

-92.63%

+68.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.90%

67.26%

-36.36%

Volatility

QCMU vs. SOXS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares (QCMU) is 41.46%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) has a volatility of 65.79%. This indicates that QCMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCMUSOXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.46%

65.79%

-24.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

92.10%

107.64%

-15.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.36%

124.35%

-19.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

102.58%

112.87%

-10.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

102.58%

102.78%

-0.20%

QCMU vs. SOXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCMU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXS's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

QCMU vs. SOXS - Dividend Comparison

QCMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than SOXS's 55.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QCMU
Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares
2.61%1.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SOXS
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares
55.65%10.79%5.45%9.22%0.19%0.00%3.58%2.30%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


QCMU and SOXS have a correlation of -0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXS has higher volatility (65.79%) compared to QCMU (41.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCMU dropped -59.48% vs SOXS's -100.00%.

On 1-year performance, QCMU leads with 3.53% vs -97.03% for SOXS. On fees, QCMU is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, QCMU has been the lower-risk option at 41.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QCMU has performed better with a 3.53% return vs -97.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QCMU is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SOXS.

SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 55.65%, compared with 2.61% for QCMU.

QCMU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SOXS is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QCMU and 1.08% for SOXS.

QCMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCMU and SOXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer