PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCMD vs. ZIVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCMD vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares (QCMD) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QCMD

1D
2.78%
1M
-28.50%
YTD
-38.50%
6M
-37.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZIVB

1D
0.00%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCMD vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCMD vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares (QCMD) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QCMD vs. ZIVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCMDZIVBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.01

Drawdowns

QCMD vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCMD drawdown since its inception was -56.03%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCMD and ZIVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCMDZIVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.03%

0.00%

-56.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.81%

0.00%

-54.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.32%

0.00%

-13.32%

Volatility

QCMD vs. ZIVB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCMDZIVBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.28%

0.00%

+47.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.28%

0.00%

+47.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.28%

0.00%

+47.28%

QCMD vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCMD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

QCMD vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison

QCMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, while ZIVB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, QCMD is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QCMD is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.

QCMD has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 0.00% for ZIVB.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for QCMD and 1.35% for ZIVB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCMD and ZIVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer