QCMD vs. YQQQ
QCMD (Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares) and YQQQ (YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QCMD is a Inverse Equities fund managed by Direxion, while YQQQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past year, QCMD returned -38.22% vs -11.10% for YQQQ. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QCMD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for YQQQ.
Performance
QCMD vs. YQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCMD achieves a -29.99% return, which is significantly lower than YQQQ's -6.68% return.
QCMD
- 1D
- -4.04%
- 1M
- 14.28%
- YTD
- -29.99%
- 6M
- -28.41%
- 1Y
- -38.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YQQQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- -6.68%
- 6M
- -5.48%
- 1Y
- -11.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCMD vs. YQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QCMD Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares | -29.99% | -11.76% |
YQQQ YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF | -6.68% | -5.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCMD and YQQQ is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.54 |
The correlation between QCMD and YQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCMD vs. YQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
QCMD
YQQQ
QCMD vs. YQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares (QCMD) and YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QCMD | YQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.88 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | -0.51 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.77 | -1.29 | -0.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QCMD vs. YQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCMD drawdown since its inception was -56.03%, which is greater than YQQQ's maximum drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCMD and YQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCMD | YQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.03% | -29.10% | -26.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.03% | -21.80% | -34.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.55% | -26.38% | -22.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.26% | -14.62% | -0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.63% | 8.81% | +12.82% |
Volatility
QCMD vs. YQQQ - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares (QCMD) has a higher volatility of 24.90% compared to YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ) at 5.98%. This indicates that QCMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCMD | YQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.90% | 5.98% | +18.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.26% | 11.17% | +34.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.35% | 13.59% | +36.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.35% | 16.56% | +33.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.35% | 16.56% | +33.79% |
QCMD vs. YQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCMD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than YQQQ's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCMD vs. YQQQ - Dividend Comparison
QCMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, less than YQQQ's 30.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QCMD Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares | 4.27% | 1.77% | 0.00% |
YQQQ YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF | 30.57% | 31.71% | 7.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCMD and YQQQ have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCMD has higher volatility (24.90%) compared to YQQQ (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCMD dropped -56.03% vs YQQQ's -29.10%.
On 1-year performance, YQQQ leads with -11.10% vs -38.22% for QCMD. On fees, YQQQ is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, YQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YQQQ has performed better with a -11.10% return vs -38.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YQQQ is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for QCMD.
YQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 30.57%, compared with 4.27% for QCMD.
QCMD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while YQQQ is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for QCMD and 0.99% for YQQQ.
QCMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.76 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCMD and YQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer