QCMD vs. SPXS

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

QCMD (Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares) and SPXS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion. Over the past year, QCMD returned -38.22% vs -41.52% for SPXS. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QCMD charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SPXS.

Performance

QCMD vs. SPXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares (QCMD) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCMD achieves a -29.99% return, which is significantly lower than SPXS's -19.79% return.

QCMD

• 1D: -4.04%
• 1M: 14.28%
• YTD: -29.99%
• 6M: -28.41%
• 1Y: -38.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPXS

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 6.38%
• YTD: -19.79%
• 6M: -16.59%
• 1Y: -41.52%
• 3Y*: -40.72%
• 5Y*: -33.23%
• 10Y*: -42.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCMD vs. SPXS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QCMD Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares	-29.99%	-11.76%
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares	-19.79%	-27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between QCMD and SPXS is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.55

The correlation between QCMD and SPXS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QCMD vs. SPXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCMD

QCMD Risk / Return Rank: 3
QCMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
QCMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
QCMD Omega Ratio Rank: 3
QCMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
QCMD Martin Ratio Rank: 0

SPXS

SPXS Risk / Return Rank: 1
SPXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
SPXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
SPXS Omega Ratio Rank: 1
SPXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SPXS Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCMD vs. SPXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares (QCMD) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QCMD	SPXS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.76	-1.12	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.94	-1.76	+0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	0.81	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.68	-0.91	+0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.77	-1.60	-0.17

QCMD vs. SPXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCMD Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is higher than the SPXS Sharpe Ratio of -1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCMD and SPXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QCMD vs. SPXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCMD drawdown since its inception was -56.03%, smaller than the maximum SPXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCMD and SPXS.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCMD	SPXS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.03%	-100.00%	+43.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.03%	-45.74%	-10.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-84.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-90.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-99.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.55%	-100.00%	+51.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.26%	-96.29%	+81.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.63%	27.24%	-5.61%

Volatility

QCMD vs. SPXS - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares (QCMD) has a higher volatility of 24.90% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS) at 14.10%. This indicates that QCMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QCMD	SPXS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.90%	14.10%	+10.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.26%	29.36%	+15.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.35%	37.23%	+13.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.35%	50.68%	-0.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.35%	53.57%	-3.22%

QCMD vs. SPXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCMD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXS's 1.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

QCMD vs. SPXS - Dividend Comparison

QCMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, which matches SPXS's 4.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QCMD Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares	4.27%	1.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares	4.23%	4.93%	6.18%	5.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.51%	1.74%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QCMD and SPXS in my portfolio?

QCMD and SPXS have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QCMD or SPXS?

QCMD has higher volatility (24.90%) compared to SPXS (14.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCMD dropped -56.03% vs SPXS's -100.00%.

Which ETF is better, QCMD or SPXS?

On 1-year performance, QCMD leads with -38.22% vs -41.52% for SPXS. On fees, QCMD is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, SPXS has been the lower-risk option at 14.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QCMD or SPXS?

Over the 1-year period, QCMD has performed better with a -38.22% return vs -41.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QCMD or SPXS?

QCMD is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SPXS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QCMD or SPXS?

QCMD has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 4.23% for SPXS.

What is the main difference between QCMD and SPXS?

Their fees differ too: 1.00% for QCMD and 1.08% for SPXS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QCMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.76 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.