QCMD vs. SHRT
QCMD (Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares) and SHRT (Gotham Short Strategies ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past year, QCMD returned -38.22% vs -22.82% for SHRT. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QCMD charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for SHRT.
Performance
QCMD vs. SHRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCMD achieves a -29.99% return, which is significantly lower than SHRT's -18.12% return.
QCMD
- 1D
- -4.04%
- 1M
- 14.28%
- YTD
- -29.99%
- 6M
- -28.41%
- 1Y
- -38.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHRT
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- -18.12%
- 6M
- -17.36%
- 1Y
- -22.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCMD vs. SHRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QCMD Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares | -29.99% | -11.76% |
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | -18.12% | -5.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCMD and SHRT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCMD vs. SHRT — Risk / Return Rank
QCMD
SHRT
QCMD vs. SHRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares (QCMD) and Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QCMD | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.73 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | -1.03 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.77 | -2.16 | +0.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QCMD vs. SHRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCMD drawdown since its inception was -56.03%, which is greater than SHRT's maximum drawdown of -26.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCMD and SHRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCMD | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.03% | -26.57% | -29.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.03% | -22.30% | -33.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.55% | -26.57% | -21.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.26% | -8.49% | -6.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.63% | 11.13% | +10.50% |
Volatility
QCMD vs. SHRT - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares (QCMD) has a higher volatility of 24.90% compared to Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) at 4.37%. This indicates that QCMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCMD | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.90% | 4.37% | +20.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.26% | 11.44% | +33.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.35% | 13.53% | +36.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.35% | 12.84% | +37.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.35% | 12.84% | +37.51% |
QCMD vs. SHRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCMD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SHRT's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCMD vs. SHRT - Dividend Comparison
QCMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than SHRT's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QCMD Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares | 4.27% | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.85% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCMD and SHRT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCMD has higher volatility (24.90%) compared to SHRT (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCMD dropped -56.03% vs SHRT's -26.57%.
On 1-year performance, SHRT leads with -22.82% vs -38.22% for QCMD. On fees, QCMD is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, SHRT has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SHRT has performed better with a -22.82% return vs -38.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QCMD is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for SHRT.
QCMD has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 0.08% for SHRT.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Gotham. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for QCMD and 1.35% for SHRT.
QCMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.76 vs -1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCMD and SHRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer