QCLR vs. QMAR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QCLR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF) and QMAR (FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QCLR is passively managed, while QMAR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QCLR returned 13.84%/yr vs 16.73%/yr for QMAR. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QCLR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QMAR.

Performance

QCLR vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCLR achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than QMAR's 13.06% return.

QCLR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.52%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: -0.07%
• 1Y: 11.39%
• 3Y*: 13.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMAR

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 13.06%
• 6M: 14.01%
• 1Y: 23.38%
• 3Y*: 16.73%
• 5Y*: 12.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCLR vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF	1.40%	11.27%	20.27%	28.87%	-18.87%	3.02%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	13.06%	10.89%	16.11%	35.47%	-16.56%	2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between QCLR and QMAR is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021	0.79

The correlation between QCLR and QMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

QCLR vs. QMAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QCLR	QMAR
Technology	53.8%	54.2%
Communication Services	15.8%	15.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	12.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	7.6%
Healthcare	4.2%	4.2%
Industrials	2.9%	2.8%
Utilities	1.4%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.2%
Energy	0.6%	0.6%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

QCLR vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCLR

QCLR Risk / Return Rank: 29
QCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
QCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
QCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 32
QCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
QCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 28

QMAR

QMAR Risk / Return Rank: 96
QMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
QMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCLR vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QCLR	QMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	3.86	-2.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	6.05	-4.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.93	-0.72
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.12	7.31	-6.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.02	52.66	-48.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QCLR vs. QMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the QMAR Sharpe Ratio of 3.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCLR and QMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QCLR	QMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.17	3.86	-2.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.91	-0.24

Drawdowns

QCLR vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCLR drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, which is greater than QMAR's maximum drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLR and QMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCLR	QMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.77%	-19.83%	-1.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.22%	-3.21%	-7.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.58%	-15.91%	+2.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.89%	-0.19%	-0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.20%	-3.28%	-2.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.84%	0.45%	+2.39%

Volatility

QCLR vs. QMAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) is 0.45%, while FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that QCLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QCLR	QMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.45%	1.27%	-0.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.24%	4.85%	+2.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.82%	6.09%	+3.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.42%	13.97%	-1.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.42%	13.85%	-1.43%

QCLR vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

QCLR vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison

QCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.68%, while QMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF	14.68%	14.89%	8.89%	0.47%	0.27%	1.64%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QCLR and QMAR in my portfolio?

QCLR and QMAR have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QCLR or QMAR?

QMAR has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to QCLR (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCLR dropped -21.77% vs QMAR's -19.83%.

Which ETF is better, QCLR or QMAR?

On 3-year performance, QMAR leads with 16.73% vs 13.84% for QCLR. On fees, QCLR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QCLR has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QCLR or QMAR?

Over the 3-year period, QMAR has performed better with a 16.73% return vs 13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QCLR or QMAR?

QCLR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QCLR or QMAR?

QCLR has the higher dividend yield at 14.68%, compared with 0.00% for QMAR.

What is the main difference between QCLR and QMAR?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QCLR and 0.90% for QMAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.