QCLR vs. IBIC
QCLR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QCLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QCLR returned 3.62% vs 4.12% for IBIC. Their -0.06 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. QCLR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
QCLR vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCLR achieves a -2.09% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.67% return.
QCLR
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -3.33%
- 6M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 3.62%
- 3Y*
- 12.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.08%
IBIC
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 4.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.04M | $841.31K | $530.52K | |
| $7.93K | $8.00K | $56.91K |
QCLR vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | -2.09% | 11.27% | 20.27% | 7.47% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.67% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCLR and IBIC is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | -0.06 |
The correlation between QCLR and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCLR vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
QCLR
IBIC
QCLR vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QCLR | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 2.12 | -1.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 15.46 | -15.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.19 | 52.95 | -51.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QCLR vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCLR drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLR and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCLR | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.77% | -0.90% | -20.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.22% | -0.27% | -9.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.30% | -0.08% | -4.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.07% | -0.10% | -5.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 0.08% | +2.98% |
Volatility
QCLR vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.23%. This indicates that QCLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCLR | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | 0.23% | +2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.00% | 0.69% | +6.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.14% | 0.89% | +9.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 1.54% | +10.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 1.54% | +10.81% |
QCLR vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCLR vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
QCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.26%, more than IBIC's 4.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 4.62% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 15.26% | 14.89% | 8.89% | 0.47% | 0.27% | 1.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCLR and IBIC have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCLR has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to IBIC (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCLR dropped -21.77% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.12% vs 3.62% for QCLR. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.12% return vs 3.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLR.
QCLR has the higher dividend yield at 15.26%, compared with 4.62% for IBIC.
QCLR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. QCLR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QCLR and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.67 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCLR and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer