QCLR vs. COPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX).
QCLR and COPX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QCLR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. COPX is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Copper Miners Index. It was launched on Apr 19, 2010. Both QCLR and COPX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QCLR vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QCLR vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | -5.98% | 11.27% | 20.27% | 28.87% | -18.87% | 3.02% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 8.86% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 5.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCLR achieves a -5.98% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 8.86% return.
QCLR
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- YTD
- -5.98%
- 6M
- -5.17%
- 1Y
- 11.38%
- 3Y*
- 12.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COPX
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -16.51%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 6M
- 32.14%
- 1Y
- 104.43%
- 3Y*
- 29.35%
- 5Y*
- 19.27%
- 10Y*
- 21.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QCLR vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QCLR vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
QCLR
COPX
QCLR vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCLR | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 2.49 | -1.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 2.81 | -1.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.39 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 3.81 | -2.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.57 | 14.52 | -9.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCLR | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 2.49 | -1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.17 | +0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between QCLR and COPX is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QCLR vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
QCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.83%, more than COPX's 2.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 15.83% | 14.89% | 8.89% | 0.47% | 0.27% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.46% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
Drawdowns
QCLR vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCLR drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLR and COPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCLR | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.77% | -83.16% | +61.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.22% | -27.82% | +17.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.10% | -18.34% | +10.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.32% | -39.59% | +33.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 7.29% | -4.73% |
Volatility
QCLR vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) is 3.93%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 18.01%. This indicates that QCLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QCLR | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 18.01% | -14.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.56% | 33.81% | -25.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 42.19% | -30.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 36.05% | -23.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 35.51% | -22.90% |