QCLN vs. IGLD
QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) and IGLD (FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QCLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy, while IGLD is a Precious Metals fund actively managed by First Trust. QCLN is passively managed, while IGLD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QCLN returned 2.04%/yr vs 13.20%/yr for IGLD. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QCLN charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for IGLD.
Performance
QCLN vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCLN achieves a 52.00% return, which is significantly higher than IGLD's 2.52% return.
QCLN
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 13.54%
- YTD
- 52.00%
- 6M
- 46.53%
- 1Y
- 117.87%
- 3Y*
- 12.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.04%
- 10Y*
- 17.14%
IGLD
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- 2.52%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 25.16%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- —
QCLN vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 52.00% | 31.81% | -18.86% | -10.02% | -30.37% | -2.02% |
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | 2.52% | 47.46% | 19.36% | 9.24% | -2.34% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCLN and IGLD is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021 | 0.15 |
The correlation between QCLN and IGLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (5 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCLN vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank
QCLN
IGLD
QCLN vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) and FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCLN | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.23 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.48 | 1.44 | +6.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.77 | 3.88 | +21.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCLN | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.42 | 1.09 | +2.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.87 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.95 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
QCLN vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCLN drawdown since its inception was -76.18%, which is greater than IGLD's maximum drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLN and IGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCLN | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.18% | -18.59% | -57.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.86% | -17.56% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.08% | -17.56% | -38.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.49% | -18.59% | -50.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.47% | -14.46% | -7.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.44% | -5.25% | -38.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.59% | 6.49% | -1.90% |
Volatility
QCLN vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a higher volatility of 12.57% compared to FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) at 5.17%. This indicates that QCLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCLN | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.57% | 5.17% | +7.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.03% | 21.01% | +5.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.68% | 23.24% | +11.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.96% | 15.17% | +22.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.90% | 15.00% | +19.90% |
QCLN vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCLN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCLN vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison
QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than IGLD's 17.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | 17.77% | 9.91% | 20.81% | 7.85% | 4.45% | 2.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.87% | 0.76% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.30% | 0.85% | 1.03% | 0.45% | 1.24% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCLN and IGLD have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCLN has higher volatility (12.57%) compared to IGLD (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCLN dropped -76.18% vs IGLD's -18.59%.
On 5-year performance, IGLD leads with 13.20% vs 2.04% for QCLN. On fees, QCLN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, IGLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IGLD has performed better with a 13.20% return vs 2.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QCLN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IGLD.
IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 17.77%, compared with 0.15% for QCLN.
QCLN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while IGLD is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QCLN and 0.85% for IGLD.
QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCLN and IGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer