PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCLN vs. FIW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QCLN vs. FIW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) and First Trust Water ETF (FIW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QCLN vs. FIW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
5.17%31.81%-18.86%-10.02%-30.37%-3.21%184.00%42.65%-12.38%32.34%
FIW
First Trust Water ETF
-3.98%7.20%8.38%20.35%-15.70%32.00%21.15%37.37%-9.23%24.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCLN achieves a 5.17% return, which is significantly higher than FIW's -3.98% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QCLN having a 12.87% annualized return and FIW not far ahead at 12.89%.


QCLN

1D
0.90%
1M
-4.61%
YTD
5.17%
6M
8.63%
1Y
61.08%
3Y*
-2.97%
5Y*
-7.09%
10Y*
12.87%

FIW

1D
0.96%
1M
-7.88%
YTD
-3.98%
6M
-7.06%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
8.37%
5Y*
6.40%
10Y*
12.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QCLN vs. FIW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCLN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FIW's 0.54% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QCLN vs. FIW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCLN
QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FIW
FIW Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIW Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIW Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCLN vs. FIW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) and First Trust Water ETF (FIW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QCLNFIWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.63

0.21

+1.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

0.46

+1.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.05

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

0.33

+3.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.27

1.04

+11.23

QCLN vs. FIW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the FIW Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCLN and FIW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCLNFIWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

0.21

+1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

0.35

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.65

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.43

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between QCLN and FIW is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QCLN vs. FIW - Dividend Comparison

QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than FIW's 0.79% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
0.21%0.25%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.24%0.72%
FIW
First Trust Water ETF
0.79%0.69%0.69%0.68%0.67%0.37%0.56%0.55%0.73%1.13%0.51%0.76%

Drawdowns

QCLN vs. FIW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCLN drawdown since its inception was -76.18%, which is greater than FIW's maximum drawdown of -52.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLN and FIW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QCLNFIWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.18%

-52.75%

-23.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.18%

-12.74%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.49%

-28.53%

-40.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.73%

-36.60%

-35.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.67%

-9.95%

-35.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.54%

-8.29%

-35.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.24%

4.01%

+1.23%

Volatility

QCLN vs. FIW - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a higher volatility of 13.73% compared to First Trust Water ETF (FIW) at 5.83%. This indicates that QCLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QCLNFIWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.73%

5.83%

+7.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.33%

11.03%

+16.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.76%

18.65%

+19.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.87%

18.30%

+19.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.62%

19.88%

+14.74%