QCGRIX vs. FOCPX
QCGRIX (CREF Growth Account Class R3) and FOCPX (Fidelity OTC Portfolio) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QCGRIX returned 27.02% vs 61.90% for FOCPX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QCGRIX charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for FOCPX.
Performance
QCGRIX vs. FOCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCGRIX achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly lower than FOCPX's 27.59% return.
QCGRIX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 5.74%
- YTD
- 9.84%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 27.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FOCPX
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- 27.59%
- 6M
- 28.74%
- 1Y
- 61.90%
- 3Y*
- 34.85%
- 5Y*
- 19.55%
- 10Y*
- 22.63%
QCGRIX vs. FOCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QCGRIX CREF Growth Account Class R3 | 9.84% | 14.41% | 0.00% |
FOCPX Fidelity OTC Portfolio | 27.59% | 22.21% | -1.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCGRIX and FOCPX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024 | 0.91 |
The correlation between QCGRIX and FOCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCGRIX vs. FOCPX — Risk / Return Rank
QCGRIX
FOCPX
QCGRIX vs. FOCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCGRIX | FOCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.59 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 5.57 | -3.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | 24.59 | -19.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCGRIX | FOCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 3.55 | -1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.66 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
QCGRIX vs. FOCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCGRIX drawdown since its inception was -23.93%, smaller than the maximum FOCPX drawdown of -70.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCGRIX and FOCPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCGRIX | FOCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.93% | -70.25% | +46.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.69% | -11.29% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -17.01% | +12.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 2.55% | +2.47% |
Volatility
QCGRIX vs. FOCPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) is 3.55%, while Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that QCGRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCGRIX | FOCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 5.41% | -1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.39% | 13.89% | -1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.63% | 17.71% | -1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 22.66% | -1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 22.44% | -1.61% |
QCGRIX vs. FOCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCGRIX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than FOCPX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCGRIX vs. FOCPX - Dividend Comparison
QCGRIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FOCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOCPX Fidelity OTC Portfolio | 6.09% | 7.78% | 16.76% | 0.05% | 4.06% | 11.53% | 6.23% | 7.58% | 7.93% | 4.86% | 3.24% | 5.41% |
QCGRIX CREF Growth Account Class R3 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, QCGRIX and FOCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FOCPX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to QCGRIX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCGRIX dropped -23.93% vs FOCPX's -70.25%.
FOCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCGRIX and FOCPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer