PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCGDX vs. GTSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QCGDX vs. GTSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) and Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QCGDX vs. GTSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QCGDX
Quantified Common Ground Fund
5.59%1.02%9.87%14.74%-12.23%32.19%14.65%0.10%
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
-4.35%1.62%10.24%26.51%-13.60%26.31%9.45%0.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCGDX achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly higher than GTSGX's -4.35% return.


QCGDX

1D
2.59%
1M
-2.22%
YTD
5.59%
6M
7.10%
1Y
8.34%
3Y*
10.05%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*

GTSGX

1D
2.26%
1M
-6.95%
YTD
-4.35%
6M
-5.69%
1Y
1.28%
3Y*
8.80%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QCGDX vs. GTSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCGDX has a 1.68% expense ratio, which is higher than GTSGX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QCGDX vs. GTSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCGDX
QCGDX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
QCGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
QCGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

GTSGX
GTSGX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
GTSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
GTSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCGDX vs. GTSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) and Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QCGDXGTSGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.65

0.07

+0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.99

0.25

+0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.03

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

0.16

+0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.42

0.47

+3.94

QCGDX vs. GTSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCGDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is higher than the GTSGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCGDX and GTSGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCGDXGTSGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

0.07

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.39

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.14

+0.45

Correlation

The correlation between QCGDX and GTSGX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QCGDX vs. GTSGX - Dividend Comparison

QCGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than GTSGX's 3.52% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QCGDX
Quantified Common Ground Fund
0.66%0.69%4.42%0.22%0.00%5.44%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
3.52%3.37%5.76%1.25%1.96%4.38%3.43%3.74%7.57%3.58%4.34%6.09%

Drawdowns

QCGDX vs. GTSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCGDX drawdown since its inception was -22.37%, smaller than the maximum GTSGX drawdown of -73.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCGDX and GTSGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QCGDXGTSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.37%

-73.82%

+51.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-11.99%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.18%

-21.94%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.22%

-10.00%

+7.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-29.79%

+23.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

4.07%

-1.81%

Volatility

QCGDX vs. GTSGX - Volatility Comparison

Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) at 4.73%. This indicates that QCGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QCGDXGTSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

4.73%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

10.17%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.74%

19.05%

-5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

17.36%

-2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.56%

18.01%

-1.45%