QCFRX vs. AHLPX
QCFRX (AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class R6) and AHLPX (American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund) are both Systematic Trend funds. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QCFRX charges 2.07%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for AHLPX.
Performance
QCFRX vs. AHLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCFRX achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly higher than AHLPX's 11.05% return.
QCFRX
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 12.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AHLPX
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 11.05%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 28.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.44%
- 10Y*
- 4.60%
QCFRX vs. AHLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QCFRX AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class R6 | 12.96% | 2.02% |
AHLPX American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 11.05% | 4.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCFRX and AHLPX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCFRX vs. AHLPX — Risk / Return Rank
QCFRX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AHLPX
QCFRX vs. AHLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class R6 (QCFRX) and American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QCFRX | AHLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.75 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QCFRX vs. AHLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCFRX drawdown since its inception was -8.00%, smaller than the maximum AHLPX drawdown of -21.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCFRX and AHLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCFRX | AHLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.00% | -21.90% | +13.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.78% | -1.43% | -3.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | -6.75% | +5.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.59% | — |
Volatility
QCFRX vs. AHLPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCFRX | AHLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 10.89% | +4.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 9.65% | +5.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 9.52% | +5.66% |
QCFRX vs. AHLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCFRX has a 2.07% expense ratio, which is higher than AHLPX's 1.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCFRX vs. AHLPX - Dividend Comparison
QCFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, less than AHLPX's 7.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHLPX American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 7.27% | 8.07% | 0.29% | 0.63% | 17.64% | 7.15% | 5.14% | 4.17% | 1.45% | 4.07% | 0.00% | 3.40% |
QCFRX AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class R6 | 6.94% | 7.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCFRX and AHLPX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for QCFRX and AHLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer