PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCAP vs. TLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QCAP vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QCAP vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCAP achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than TLTW's 1.44% return.


QCAP

1D
0.35%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.19%
6M
2.96%
1Y
8.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLTW

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.98%
YTD
1.44%
6M
2.22%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
0.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QCAP vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCAP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QCAP vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCAP
QCAP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCAP vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QCAPTLTWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

0.84

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

1.17

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.15

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

1.42

-0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.07

3.74

+3.33

QCAP vs. TLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCAP Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the TLTW Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCAP and TLTW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCAPTLTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

0.84

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

-0.03

+1.11

Correlation

The correlation between QCAP and TLTW is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QCAP vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison

QCAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.66%.


TTM2025202420232022
QCAP
FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
13.66%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%

Drawdowns

QCAP vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCAP drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, smaller than the maximum TLTW drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCAP and TLTW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QCAPTLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.17%

-18.61%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.13%

-5.80%

-2.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.98%

+2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-8.49%

+7.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

2.20%

-0.94%

Volatility

QCAP vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) is 0.70%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that QCAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QCAPTLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

3.46%

-2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.62%

5.80%

-4.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.02%

8.91%

+2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.04%

11.55%

-2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.04%

11.55%

-2.51%