PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBUL vs. AJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBUL vs. AJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026 (AJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBUL achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than AJUL's 3.30% return.


QBUL

1D
-0.33%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
1.20%
6M
1.37%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AJUL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.37%
YTD
3.30%
6M
3.25%
1Y
8.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBUL vs. AJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QBUL and AJUL is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2024

0.58

The correlation between QBUL and AJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBUL vs. AJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBUL
QBUL Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
QBUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBUL Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
QBUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBUL Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

AJUL
AJUL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
AJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBUL vs. AJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026 (AJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QBULAJULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.63

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

3.89

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.33

23.08

-19.75

QBUL vs. AJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the AJUL Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBUL and AJUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QBUL vs. AJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBUL drawdown since its inception was -2.45%, smaller than the maximum AJUL drawdown of -6.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBUL and AJUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBULAJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.45%

-6.06%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.45%

-2.19%

-0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

0.00%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.98%

-0.49%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

0.37%

+0.91%

Volatility

QBUL vs. AJUL - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) has a higher volatility of 1.83% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026 (AJUL) at 0.21%. This indicates that QBUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBULAJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.83%

0.21%

+1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

2.46%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90%

3.14%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.92%

4.94%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.92%

4.94%

-1.02%

QBUL vs. AJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QBUL and AJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

QBUL vs. AJUL - Dividend Comparison

QBUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.84%, while AJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


QBUL and AJUL have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QBUL has higher volatility (1.83%) compared to AJUL (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBUL dropped -2.45% vs AJUL's -6.06%.

On 1-year performance, AJUL leads with 8.49% vs 4.24% for QBUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, AJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AJUL has performed better with a 8.49% return vs 4.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QBUL and AJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

QBUL has the higher dividend yield at 8.84%, compared with 0.00% for AJUL.

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Innovator.

AJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBUL and AJUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer