PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBUL vs. AAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBUL vs. AAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBUL achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly lower than AAPR's 3.96% return.


QBUL

1D
0.12%
1M
1.73%
YTD
2.81%
6M
2.73%
1Y
6.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AAPR

1D
0.10%
1M
0.61%
YTD
3.96%
6M
4.75%
1Y
10.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBUL vs. AAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QBUL and AAPR is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024

0.64

The correlation between QBUL and AAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBUL vs. AAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBUL
QBUL Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
QBUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBUL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QBUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBUL Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPR
AAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBUL vs. AAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QBULAAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

4.33

-2.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

7.48

-4.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

2.03

-0.71

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

12.63

-10.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.02

65.90

-60.88

QBUL vs. AAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the AAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBUL and AAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QBULAAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

4.33

-2.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

1.75

-0.60

Drawdowns

QBUL vs. AAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBUL drawdown since its inception was -2.45%, smaller than the maximum AAPR drawdown of -5.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBUL and AAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBULAAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.45%

-5.99%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.45%

-0.81%

-1.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.02%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.98%

-0.45%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

0.16%

+1.08%

Volatility

QBUL vs. AAPR - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) at 0.70%. This indicates that QBUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBULAAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

0.70%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.23%

1.57%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53%

2.36%

+1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.78%

4.81%

-1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.78%

4.81%

-1.03%

QBUL vs. AAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QBUL and AAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

QBUL vs. AAPR - Dividend Comparison

QBUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.70%, while AAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


QBUL and AAPR have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QBUL has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to AAPR (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBUL dropped -2.45% vs AAPR's -5.99%.

On 1-year performance, AAPR leads with 10.16% vs 6.05% for QBUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, AAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAPR has performed better with a 10.16% return vs 6.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QBUL and AAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

QBUL has the higher dividend yield at 8.70%, compared with 0.00% for AAPR.

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Innovator.

AAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.33 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBUL and AAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer