PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBUF vs. PQAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBUF vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (QBUF) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBUF achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly lower than PQAP's 12.09% return.


QBUF

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.84%
YTD
4.68%
6M
4.57%
1Y
11.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PQAP

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.44%
YTD
12.09%
6M
13.01%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBUF vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QBUF and PQAP is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

0.77

The correlation between QBUF and PQAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBUF vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBUF
QBUF Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
QBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
QBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

PQAP
PQAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PQAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PQAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBUF vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (QBUF) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QBUFPQAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

2.20

-0.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.19

15.50

-10.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.79

86.25

-68.46

QBUF vs. PQAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBUF Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is lower than the PQAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBUF and PQAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QBUFPQAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

4.86

-2.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

1.76

-0.40

Drawdowns

QBUF vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBUF drawdown since its inception was -8.84%, smaller than the maximum PQAP drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBUF and PQAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBUFPQAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-10.79%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.31%

-1.39%

-0.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.12%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.82%

-0.60%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

0.25%

+0.42%

Volatility

QBUF vs. PQAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (QBUF) is 0.23%, while PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP) has a volatility of 1.02%. This indicates that QBUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBUFPQAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.23%

1.02%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.88%

3.09%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.25%

4.45%

+0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.47%

11.03%

-2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.47%

11.03%

-2.56%

QBUF vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBUF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PQAP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBUF vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison

QBUF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QBUF and PQAP have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PQAP has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to QBUF (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBUF dropped -8.84% vs PQAP's -10.79%.

On 1-year performance, PQAP leads with 21.47% vs 11.93% for QBUF. On fees, PQAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QBUF has been the lower-risk option at 0.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PQAP has performed better with a 21.47% return vs 11.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PQAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBUF.

PQAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for QBUF.

QBUF is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while PQAP is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QBUF and 0.50% for PQAP.

PQAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBUF and PQAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer