QBTZ vs. SH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QBTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both Inverse Equities funds. QBTZ is actively managed, while SH is passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QBTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SH.

Performance

QBTZ vs. SH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTZ achieves a -86.63% return, which is significantly lower than SH's -8.00% return.

QBTZ

• 1D: 16.41%
• 1M: -74.19%
• YTD: -86.63%
• 6M: -91.97%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SH

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: -8.00%
• 6M: -7.59%
• 1Y: -17.23%
• 3Y*: -13.02%
• 5Y*: -9.07%
• 10Y*: -12.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBTZ vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF	-86.63%	-50.03%
SH ProShares Short S&P500	-8.00%	-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between QBTZ and SH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

QBTZ vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SH

SH Risk / Return Rank: 1
SH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
SH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
SH Omega Ratio Rank: 1
SH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SH Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBTZ vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QBTZ	SH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-1.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.42	-0.59	+0.17

Drawdowns

QBTZ vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTZ drawdown since its inception was -96.03%, roughly equal to the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTZ and SH.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBTZ	SH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.03%	-94.66%	-1.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.28%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-38.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.53%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-76.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.35%	-94.62%	-0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.63%	-67.73%	+12.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QBTZ	SH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.84%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.91%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	235.15%	11.80%	+223.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	235.15%	16.85%	+218.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	235.15%	18.01%	+217.14%

QBTZ vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

QBTZ vs. SH - Dividend Comparison

QBTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SH ProShares Short S&P500	4.51%	4.49%	6.20%	5.37%	1.08%	0.00%	0.16%	1.76%	1.01%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBTZ and SH in my portfolio?

QBTZ and SH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QBTZ or SH?

On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBTZ or SH?

SH is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for QBTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBTZ or SH?

SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 0.00% for QBTZ.

What is the main difference between QBTZ and SH?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for QBTZ and 0.90% for SH.