PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBTZ vs. QQQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBTZ vs. QQQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTZ achieves a -84.61% return, which is significantly lower than QQQT's 11.65% return.


QBTZ

1D
-1.12%
1M
5.00%
6M
-87.87%
YTD
-84.61%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

QQQT

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.00%
6M
10.64%
YTD
11.65%
1Y
21.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.48M$12.89M$20.27M
$646.52K$600.88K$778.52K

QBTZ vs. QQQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QBTZ and QQQT is -0.50, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025

-0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBTZ vs. QQQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QBTZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QQQT
QQQT Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
QQQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQT Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QBTZ vs. QQQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QBTZQQQTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.68

QBTZ vs. QQQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QBTZ vs. QQQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTZ drawdown since its inception was -96.03%, which is greater than QQQT's maximum drawdown of -22.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTZ and QQQT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBTZQQQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.03%

-22.50%

-73.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.65%

-6.81%

-87.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.87%

-4.02%

-58.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

Volatility

QBTZ vs. QQQT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBTZQQQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

230.14%

17.87%

+212.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

230.14%

20.84%

+209.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

230.14%

20.84%

+209.30%

QBTZ vs. QQQT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQT's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBTZ vs. QQQT - Dividend Comparison

QBTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.87%.


PositionTTM20252024
QBTZ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQT
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF
19.05%21.27%10.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


QBTZ and QQQT have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQT is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQT is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for QBTZ.

QQQT has the higher dividend yield at 19.05%, compared with 0.00% for QBTZ.

QBTZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QQQT is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for QBTZ and 1.05% for QQQT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBTZ and QQQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer