QBTZ vs. PLTZ
QBTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF) and PLTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds from Defiance. Both are actively managed. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 1.29% expense ratio.
Performance
QBTZ vs. PLTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBTZ achieves a -84.61% return, which is significantly lower than PLTZ's 21.54% return.
QBTZ
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 5.00%
- 6M
- -87.87%
- YTD
- -84.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PLTZ
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- 6M
- -13.72%
- YTD
- 21.54%
- 1Y
- -31.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -54.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.99M | $15.04M | $15.41M | |
| $14.48M | $12.89M | $20.27M |
QBTZ vs. PLTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF | -84.61% | -47.53% |
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF | 21.54% | -14.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBTZ and PLTZ is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBTZ vs. PLTZ — Risk / Return Rank
QBTZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PLTZ
QBTZ vs. PLTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBTZ | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.03 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.84 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBTZ vs. PLTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBTZ drawdown since its inception was -96.03%, which is greater than PLTZ's maximum drawdown of -72.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTZ and PLTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBTZ | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.03% | -72.51% | -23.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.65% | -59.97% | -34.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.87% | -56.02% | -6.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 33.87% | — |
Volatility
QBTZ vs. PLTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBTZ | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 27.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 80.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 230.14% | 104.74% | +125.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 230.14% | 102.47% | +127.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 230.14% | 102.47% | +127.67% |
QBTZ vs. PLTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QBTZ and PLTZ have an expense ratio of 1.29%.
Dividends
QBTZ vs. PLTZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither QBTZ nor PLTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QBTZ and PLTZ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.29% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QBTZ and PLTZ have the same expense ratio: 1.29% per year.
QBTZ and PLTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for QBTZ and PLTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer