PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBTZ vs. PLTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBTZ vs. PLTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTZ achieves a -86.63% return, which is significantly lower than PLTZ's 4.28% return.


QBTZ

1D
16.41%
1M
-74.19%
YTD
-86.63%
6M
-91.97%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTZ

1D
13.03%
1M
-4.65%
YTD
4.28%
6M
-1.19%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBTZ vs. PLTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QBTZ and PLTZ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBTZ vs. PLTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QBTZ vs. PLTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QBTZPLTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

-0.62

+0.20

Drawdowns

QBTZ vs. PLTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTZ drawdown since its inception was -96.03%, which is greater than PLTZ's maximum drawdown of -70.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTZ and PLTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBTZPLTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.03%

-70.28%

-25.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.35%

-62.87%

-32.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.63%

-52.02%

-3.61%

Volatility

QBTZ vs. PLTZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBTZPLTZDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

235.15%

101.99%

+133.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

235.15%

101.99%

+133.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

235.15%

101.99%

+133.16%

QBTZ vs. PLTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QBTZ and PLTZ have an expense ratio of 1.29%.


Dividends

QBTZ vs. PLTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither QBTZ nor PLTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QBTZ and PLTZ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.29% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QBTZ and PLTZ have the same expense ratio: 1.29% per year.

QBTZ and PLTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and Defiance.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBTZ and PLTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer