QBTZ vs. HDGE
QBTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF) and HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QBTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for HDGE.
Performance
QBTZ vs. HDGE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBTZ achieves a -82.79% return, which is significantly lower than HDGE's 0.06% return.
QBTZ
- 1D
- 10.29%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- 6M
- -78.88%
- YTD
- -82.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDGE
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 1Y
- 0.54%
- 3Y*
- -3.07%
- 5Y*
- -3.54%
- 10Y*
- -15.06%
QBTZ vs. HDGE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF | -82.79% | -47.53% |
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 0.06% | 1.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBTZ and HDGE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBTZ vs. HDGE — Risk / Return Rank
QBTZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HDGE
QBTZ vs. HDGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBTZ | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.04 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.14 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBTZ vs. HDGE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBTZ drawdown since its inception was -96.03%, roughly equal to the maximum HDGE drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTZ and HDGE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBTZ | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.03% | -93.88% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.02% | -93.43% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.50% | -70.24% | +9.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.44% | — |
Volatility
QBTZ vs. HDGE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBTZ | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 229.09% | 18.51% | +210.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 229.09% | 24.25% | +204.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 229.09% | 23.45% | +205.64% |
QBTZ vs. HDGE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGE's 3.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBTZ vs. HDGE - Dividend Comparison
QBTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 3.49% | 3.50% | 7.83% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% |
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBTZ and HDGE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QBTZ is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QBTZ is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.
HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.00% for QBTZ.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for QBTZ and 3.36% for HDGE.
Find the right allocation for QBTZ and HDGE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer