QBTZ vs. AIPO
QBTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QBTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while AIPO is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. QBTZ is actively managed, while AIPO is passively managed. Their -0.62 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. QBTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.
Performance
QBTZ vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBTZ achieves a -84.61% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 29.43% return.
QBTZ
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 5.00%
- 6M
- -87.87%
- YTD
- -84.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AIPO
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -7.73%
- 6M
- 16.62%
- YTD
- 29.43%
- 1Y
- 42.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 40.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $40.86M | $38.41M | $47.30M | |
| $14.48M | $12.89M | $20.27M |
QBTZ vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF | -84.61% | -47.53% |
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 29.43% | -6.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBTZ and AIPO is -0.62, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | -0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBTZ vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank
QBTZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AIPO
QBTZ vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBTZ | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.61 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.40 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBTZ vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBTZ drawdown since its inception was -96.03%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -24.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTZ and AIPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBTZ | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.03% | -24.36% | -71.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.65% | -17.66% | -76.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.87% | -5.28% | -57.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.27% | — |
Volatility
QBTZ vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBTZ | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 230.14% | 37.46% | +192.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 230.14% | 37.20% | +192.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 230.14% | 37.20% | +192.94% |
QBTZ vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBTZ vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison
QBTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% |
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBTZ and AIPO have a correlation of -0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for QBTZ.
AIPO has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for QBTZ.
QBTZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AIPO is Artificial Intelligence. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for QBTZ and 0.69% for AIPO.
Find the right allocation for QBTZ and AIPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer