QBTS vs. TTWO
QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) and TTWO (Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.) are both stocks. QBTS operates in Computer Hardware (Technology), while TTWO operates in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia (Communication Services). Over the past 3 years, QBTS returned 123.62%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for TTWO. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QBTS vs. TTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBTS achieves a -10.63% return, which is significantly higher than TTWO's -17.29% return.
QBTS
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 5.60%
- YTD
- -10.63%
- 6M
- -10.46%
- 1Y
- 54.05%
- 3Y*
- 123.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TTWO
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -12.65%
- YTD
- -17.29%
- 6M
- -12.31%
- 1Y
- -8.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.77%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 18.63%
QBTS vs. TTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | -10.63% | 211.31% | 854.44% | -38.88% | -83.96% |
TTWO Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | -17.29% | 39.09% | 14.37% | 54.57% | -18.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBTS and TTWO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
QBTS:
$8.59B
TTWO:
$39.24B
QBTS:
-$1.08
TTWO:
-$1.62
QBTS:
637.12
TTWO:
5.84
QBTS:
7.64
TTWO:
11.18
QBTS:
$12.44M
TTWO:
$6.66B
QBTS:
$8.25M
TTWO:
$3.81B
QBTS:
-$399.03M
TTWO:
$850.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBTS vs. TTWO — Risk / Return Rank
QBTS
TTWO
QBTS vs. TTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBTS | TTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.96 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | -0.35 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.16 | -0.76 | +1.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBTS vs. TTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBTS drawdown since its inception was -96.67%, which is greater than TTWO's maximum drawdown of -80.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTS and TTWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBTS | TTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.67% | -80.85% | -15.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.01% | -27.68% | -43.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.17% | -27.68% | -51.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -51.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.81% | -19.27% | -28.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.66% | -27.79% | -37.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.64% | 12.81% | +27.83% |
Volatility
QBTS vs. TTWO - Volatility Comparison
D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a higher volatility of 42.66% compared to Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) at 10.33%. This indicates that QBTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBTS | TTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.66% | 10.33% | +32.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.89% | 23.93% | +52.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 108.46% | 29.37% | +79.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 150.99% | 32.30% | +118.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 150.99% | 34.03% | +116.96% |
Dividends
QBTS vs. TTWO - Dividend Comparison
Neither QBTS nor TTWO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
QBTS vs. TTWO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between D-Wave Quantum Inc and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
QBTS and TTWO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTS has higher volatility (42.66%) compared to TTWO (10.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBTS dropped -96.67% vs TTWO's -80.85%.
QBTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QBTS and TTWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer