QBTS vs. AMPX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) and AMPX (Amprius Technologies Inc.) are both stocks. QBTS operates in Computer Hardware (Technology), while AMPX operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, QBTS returned 88.49%/yr vs 9.36%/yr for AMPX. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

QBTS vs. AMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and Amprius Technologies Inc. (AMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTS achieves a -30.86% return, which is significantly lower than AMPX's 21.67% return.

QBTS

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: -19.75%
• 6M: -14.80%
• YTD: -30.86%
• 1Y: 10.38%
• 3Y*: 88.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.23%

AMPX

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -22.46%
• 6M: -22.83%
• YTD: 21.67%
• 1Y: 50.94%
• 3Y*: 9.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMPX Amprius Technologies Inc.	$51.41M	$65.22M	$125.73M
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc	$359.00M	$350.88M	$734.73M

QBTS vs. AMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc	-30.86%	211.31%	854.44%	-38.88%	-81.54%
AMPX Amprius Technologies Inc.	21.67%	181.79%	-47.07%	-33.29%	-11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between QBTS and AMPX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2022	0.32

Over the past year, QBTS and AMPX have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap QBTS : $6.64B AMPX : $1.36B
EPS QBTS : -$1.04 AMPX : -$0.30
PS Ratio QBTS : 514.63 AMPX : 14.03
PB Ratio QBTS : 5.91 AMPX : 12.02
Total Revenue (TTM) QBTS : $12.44M AMPX : $90.26M
Gross Profit (TTM) QBTS : $8.25M AMPX : $16.37M
EBITDA (TTM) QBTS : -$399.03M AMPX : -$17.72M

Return for Risk

QBTS vs. AMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QBTS

QBTS Risk / Return Rank: 50
QBTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
QBTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
QBTS Omega Ratio Rank: 53
QBTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
QBTS Martin Ratio Rank: 46

AMPX

AMPX Risk / Return Rank: 61
AMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
AMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
AMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
AMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
AMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QBTS vs. AMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and Amprius Technologies Inc. (AMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QBTS	AMPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.05	0.36	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.96	1.26	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.14	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.07	0.61	-0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.12	1.50	-1.39

QBTS vs. AMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBTS Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the AMPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBTS and AMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QBTS vs. AMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTS drawdown since its inception was -96.67%, roughly equal to the maximum AMPX drawdown of -94.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTS and AMPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBTS	AMPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.67%	-94.49%	-2.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-71.01%	-63.16%	-7.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-71.01%	-90.22%	+19.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.62%	-58.10%	-1.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.27%	-54.70%	-10.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	44.79%	25.68%	+19.11%

Volatility

QBTS vs. AMPX - Volatility Comparison

D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a higher volatility of 30.87% compared to Amprius Technologies Inc. (AMPX) at 28.32%. This indicates that QBTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QBTS	AMPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	30.87%	28.32%	+2.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	77.01%	81.25%	-4.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	110.95%	106.81%	+4.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	149.71%	127.82%	+21.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	149.71%	127.82%	+21.89%

Dividends

QBTS vs. AMPX - Dividend Comparison

Neither QBTS nor AMPX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBTS and AMPX in my portfolio?

QBTS and AMPX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QBTS or AMPX?

QBTS has higher volatility (30.87%) compared to AMPX (28.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBTS dropped -96.67% vs AMPX's -94.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.