QBSF vs. NVDO
QBSF (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 ETF) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QBSF charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
QBSF vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBSF achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 20.98% return.
QBSF
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 3.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 17.25%
- YTD
- 20.98%
- 6M
- 29.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBSF vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBSF AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 ETF | 2.42% | 3.41% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 20.98% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBSF and NVDO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBSF vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 ETF (QBSF) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QBSF | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.89 | 1.39 | +1.50 |
Drawdowns
QBSF vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBSF drawdown since its inception was -1.58%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBSF and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBSF | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -16.25% | +14.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -0.93% | +0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -4.97% | +4.75% |
Volatility
QBSF vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBSF | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74% | 31.91% | -29.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 31.91% | -29.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 31.91% | -29.17% |
QBSF vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBSF has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBSF vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
QBSF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 13.77% | 16.66% |
QBSF AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBSF and NVDO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QBSF is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QBSF is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for NVDO.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 13.77%, compared with 0.00% for QBSF.
They also come from different issuers: AllianzIM and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for QBSF and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for QBSF and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer