PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBR-A.TO vs. KT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QBR-A.TO vs. KT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Quebecor Inc (QBR-A.TO) and KT Corporation (KT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QBR-A.TO is traded in CAD, while KT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBR-A.TO achieves a 31.78% return, which is significantly higher than KT's 1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, QBR-A.TO has outperformed KT with an annualized return of 16.72%, while KT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.91% annualized return.


QBR-A.TO

1D
-1.26%
1M
20.00%
YTD
31.78%
6M
33.95%
1Y
73.96%
3Y*
31.73%
5Y*
20.27%
10Y*
16.72%

KT

1D
1.28%
1M
-9.85%
YTD
1.26%
6M
3.29%
1Y
-1.22%
3Y*
24.35%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
6.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBR-A.TO vs. KT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QBR-A.TO
Quebecor Inc
31.78%63.39%0.05%17.49%8.94%-8.61%2.07%17.13%21.51%27.55%
KT
KT Corporation
1.26%21.90%30.09%2.51%20.52%20.94%-7.34%-21.79%-1.25%3.29%

Correlation

The correlation between QBR-A.TO and KT is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.06

The correlation between QBR-A.TO and KT shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.08 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QBR-A.TO:

CA$15.63B

KT:

$10.39B

EPS

QBR-A.TO:

CA$3.85

KT:

$3.14K

PE Ratio

QBR-A.TO:

17.56

KT:

0.01

PEG Ratio

QBR-A.TO:

1.47

KT:

0.00

PS Ratio

QBR-A.TO:

2.73

KT:

0.00

PB Ratio

QBR-A.TO:

5.84

KT:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

QBR-A.TO:

CA$5.73B

KT:

$28.39T

Gross Profit (TTM)

QBR-A.TO:

CA$2.22B

KT:

$15.90T

EBITDA (TTM)

QBR-A.TO:

CA$2.40B

KT:

$5.41T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBR-A.TO vs. KT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBR-A.TO
QBR-A.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
QBR-A.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBR-A.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBR-A.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QBR-A.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBR-A.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

KT
KT Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
KT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
KT Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
KT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
KT Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBR-A.TO vs. KT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quebecor Inc (QBR-A.TO) and KT Corporation (KT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QBR-A.TOKTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.01

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.27

-0.05

+6.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.28

-0.12

+16.40

QBR-A.TO vs. KT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBR-A.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the KT Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBR-A.TO and KT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QBR-A.TOKTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

-0.06

+2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.59

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.29

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.11

+0.38

Drawdowns

QBR-A.TO vs. KT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBR-A.TO drawdown since its inception was -66.72%, which is greater than KT's maximum drawdown of -58.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBR-A.TO and KT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBR-A.TOKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.72%

-58.56%

-8.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.86%

-26.68%

+14.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.03%

-26.68%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.32%

-26.68%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.92%

-58.53%

+27.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.43%

-21.75%

+16.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.25%

-23.42%

+12.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.56%

9.84%

-5.28%

Volatility

QBR-A.TO vs. KT - Volatility Comparison

Quebecor Inc (QBR-A.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.39% compared to KT Corporation (KT) at 7.54%. This indicates that QBR-A.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBR-A.TOKTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.39%

7.54%

+6.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.41%

16.66%

+5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.84%

21.68%

+14.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.58%

23.15%

+10.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.25%

24.02%

+4.23%

Dividends

QBR-A.TO vs. KT - Dividend Comparison

QBR-A.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than KT's 3.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KT
KT Corporation
3.34%4.24%3.50%5.29%5.40%6.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.49%1.84%
QBR-A.TO
Quebecor Inc
2.22%2.70%3.95%3.51%3.97%3.80%2.44%1.19%0.68%0.77%0.91%0.77%

Financials

QBR-A.TO vs. KT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quebecor Inc and KT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00T4.00T6.00T8.00T20222023202420252026
1.40B
6.98T
(QBR-A.TO) Total Revenue
(KT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. QBR-A.TO values in CAD, KT values in USD

QBR-A.TO vs. KT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Quebecor Inc and KT Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
43.6%
32.7%
Portfolio components
QBR-A.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quebecor Inc reported a gross profit of 608.10M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.

KT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.28T and revenue of 6.98T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

QBR-A.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quebecor Inc reported an operating income of 367.20M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.3%.

KT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported an operating income of 492.09B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

QBR-A.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quebecor Inc reported a net income of 225.40M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.

KT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported a net income of 399.91B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QBR-A.TO and KT have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBR-A.TO and KT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer