PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBR-A.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QBR-A.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Quebecor Inc (QBR-A.TO) and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBR-A.TO achieves a 32.58% return, which is significantly higher than GRT-UN.TO's 18.76% return. Over the past 10 years, QBR-A.TO has outperformed GRT-UN.TO with an annualized return of 16.66%, while GRT-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 14.34% annualized return.


QBR-A.TO

1D
-4.20%
1M
21.07%
YTD
32.58%
6M
33.61%
1Y
75.02%
3Y*
32.36%
5Y*
20.12%
10Y*
16.66%

GRT-UN.TO

1D
1.53%
1M
3.08%
YTD
18.76%
6M
28.20%
1Y
43.81%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
8.10%
10Y*
14.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBR-A.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QBR-A.TO
Quebecor Inc
32.58%63.39%0.05%17.49%8.94%-8.61%2.07%17.13%21.51%27.06%
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
18.76%22.79%-4.30%15.18%-31.89%40.45%23.02%29.65%14.45%16.24%

Correlation

The correlation between QBR-A.TO and GRT-UN.TO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2003

0.07

The correlation between QBR-A.TO and GRT-UN.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.12 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QBR-A.TO:

CA$15.73B

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$5.79B

EPS

QBR-A.TO:

CA$3.85

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$6.39

PE Ratio

QBR-A.TO:

17.67

GRT-UN.TO:

14.95

PEG Ratio

QBR-A.TO:

1.48

GRT-UN.TO:

0.92

PS Ratio

QBR-A.TO:

2.75

GRT-UN.TO:

9.25

PB Ratio

QBR-A.TO:

5.87

GRT-UN.TO:

1.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

QBR-A.TO:

CA$5.73B

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$629.87M

Gross Profit (TTM)

QBR-A.TO:

CA$2.22B

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$517.51M

EBITDA (TTM)

QBR-A.TO:

CA$2.40B

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$513.85M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBR-A.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBR-A.TO
QBR-A.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
QBR-A.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBR-A.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBR-A.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
QBR-A.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBR-A.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

GRT-UN.TO
GRT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBR-A.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quebecor Inc (QBR-A.TO) and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QBR-A.TOGRT-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.39

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.28

3.41

+6.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.24

10.95

+16.28

QBR-A.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBR-A.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBR-A.TO and GRT-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QBR-A.TOGRT-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87

2.29

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.37

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.64

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.37

-0.11

Drawdowns

QBR-A.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBR-A.TO drawdown since its inception was -78.58%, smaller than the maximum GRT-UN.TO drawdown of -87.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBR-A.TO and GRT-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBR-A.TOGRT-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.58%

-87.70%

+9.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.86%

-12.91%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.03%

-27.99%

+4.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.32%

-37.82%

+12.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.92%

-44.89%

+13.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.85%

-0.95%

-3.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.71%

-16.30%

-17.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

4.01%

+0.13%

Volatility

QBR-A.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Quebecor Inc (QBR-A.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.83% compared to Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) at 5.91%. This indicates that QBR-A.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRT-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBR-A.TOGRT-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.83%

5.91%

+8.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.51%

14.77%

+9.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.56%

19.28%

+23.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.54%

21.88%

+16.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.97%

22.43%

+8.54%

Dividends

QBR-A.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

QBR-A.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than GRT-UN.TO's 3.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
3.64%4.17%4.74%4.21%4.49%3.03%3.75%4.25%5.69%5.63%5.77%6.44%
QBR-A.TO
Quebecor Inc
2.21%2.70%3.95%3.51%3.97%3.80%2.44%1.20%0.68%0.45%0.45%0.38%

Financials

QBR-A.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quebecor Inc and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.40B
165.83M
(QBR-A.TO) Total Revenue
(GRT-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

QBR-A.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Quebecor Inc and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
43.6%
81.0%
Portfolio components
QBR-A.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quebecor Inc reported a gross profit of 608.10M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.

GRT-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 134.27M and revenue of 165.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.0%.

QBR-A.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quebecor Inc reported an operating income of 367.20M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.3%.

GRT-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 122.29M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 73.7%.

QBR-A.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quebecor Inc reported a net income of 225.40M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.

GRT-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 91.25M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in a net margin of 55.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QBR-A.TO and GRT-UN.TO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBR-A.TO and GRT-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer