PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBIG vs. QQUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBIG vs. QQUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) and ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBIG achieves a -3.30% return, which is significantly higher than QQUP's -10.47% return.


QBIG

1D
-2.37%
1M
-11.77%
YTD
-3.30%
6M
-4.71%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQUP

1D
-5.22%
1M
-22.93%
YTD
-10.47%
6M
-13.08%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBIG vs. QQUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QBIG
Invesco Top QQQ ETF
-3.30%23.61%
QQUP
ProShares Ultra Top QQQ
-10.47%45.33%

Correlation

The correlation between QBIG and QQUP is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.98

The correlation between QBIG and QQUP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBIG vs. QQUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBIG
QBIG Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
QBIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBIG Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
QBIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBIG Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

QQUP
QQUP Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
QQUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQUP Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
QQUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQUP Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBIG vs. QQUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) and ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QBIGQQUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.13

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

0.64

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.47

1.75

+0.72

QBIG vs. QQUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBIG Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the QQUP Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBIG and QQUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QBIG vs. QQUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBIG drawdown since its inception was -30.33%, smaller than the maximum QQUP drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBIG and QQUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBIGQQUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.33%

-37.67%

+7.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.70%

-37.67%

+17.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.09%

-26.83%

+12.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.07%

-9.60%

+2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.67%

13.63%

-6.96%

Volatility

QBIG vs. QQUP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) is 7.46%, while ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) has a volatility of 14.60%. This indicates that QBIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBIGQQUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.46%

14.60%

-7.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.78%

30.99%

-15.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.53%

40.30%

-19.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.42%

40.03%

-12.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.42%

40.03%

-12.61%

QBIG vs. QQUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBIG has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QQUP's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBIG vs. QQUP - Dividend Comparison

QBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.


PositionTTM2025
QBIG
Invesco Top QQQ ETF
0.00%0.00%
QQUP
ProShares Ultra Top QQQ
0.74%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, QBIG and QQUP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQUP has higher volatility (14.60%) compared to QBIG (7.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBIG dropped -30.33% vs QQUP's -37.67%.

On 1-year performance, QQUP leads with 23.84% vs 16.43% for QBIG. On fees, QBIG is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QBIG has been the lower-risk option at 7.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQUP has performed better with a 23.84% return vs 16.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QBIG is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQUP.

QQUP has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for QBIG.

QBIG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QQUP is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QBIG and 0.95% for QQUP.

QBIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBIG and QQUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer