PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBIG vs. QQUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBIG vs. QQUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) and ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBIG achieves a 8.86% return, which is significantly lower than QQUP's 14.60% return.


QBIG

1D
0.06%
1M
3.57%
YTD
8.86%
6M
6.25%
1Y
35.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQUP

1D
0.09%
1M
6.27%
YTD
14.60%
6M
8.14%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBIG vs. QQUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QBIG
Invesco Top QQQ ETF
8.86%23.29%
QQUP
ProShares Ultra Top QQQ
14.60%44.45%

Correlation

The correlation between QBIG and QQUP is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025

0.98

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBIG vs. QQUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBIG
QBIG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
QBIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QBIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBIG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

QQUP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBIG vs. QQUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) and ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QBIGQQUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.66

QBIG vs. QQUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QBIGQQUPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

1.77

-0.92

Drawdowns

QBIG vs. QQUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBIG drawdown since its inception was -30.33%, smaller than the maximum QQUP drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBIG and QQUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBIGQQUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.33%

-37.67%

+7.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-6.33%

+3.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.01%

-9.18%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.30%

Volatility

QBIG vs. QQUP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBIGQQUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.42%

38.44%

-19.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.28%

38.44%

-11.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.28%

38.44%

-11.16%

QBIG vs. QQUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBIG has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QQUP's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBIG vs. QQUP - Dividend Comparison

QBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.


PositionTTM2025
QBIG
Invesco Top QQQ ETF
0.00%0.00%
QQUP
ProShares Ultra Top QQQ
0.42%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, QBIG and QQUP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, QBIG is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QBIG is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQUP.

QQUP has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for QBIG.

QBIG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QQUP is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QBIG and 0.95% for QQUP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBIG and QQUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer