QBIG vs. PPA

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

QBIG (Invesco Top QQQ ETF) and PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QBIG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Invesco, while PPA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the SPADE Defense Index. QBIG is actively managed, while PPA is passively managed. Over the past year, QBIG returned 16.43% vs 26.01% for PPA. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QBIG charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PPA.

Performance

QBIG vs. PPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBIG achieves a -3.30% return, which is significantly lower than PPA's 9.73% return.

QBIG

• 1D: -2.37%
• 1M: -11.77%
• YTD: -3.30%
• 6M: -4.71%
• 1Y: 16.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PPA

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -1.27%
• YTD: 9.73%
• 6M: 7.35%
• 1Y: 26.01%
• 3Y*: 28.70%
• 5Y*: 18.28%
• 10Y*: 18.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBIG vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QBIG Invesco Top QQQ ETF	-3.30%	21.46%	3.04%
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF	9.73%	37.15%	-4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between QBIG and PPA is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.43

QBIG vs. PPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QBIG	PPA
Technology	22.9%	9.2%
Financial Services	10.5%	0.1%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	-
Communication Services	6.7%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	90.6%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

QBIG vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBIG

QBIG Risk / Return Rank: 22
QBIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
QBIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
QBIG Omega Ratio Rank: 22
QBIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
QBIG Martin Ratio Rank: 22

PPA

PPA Risk / Return Rank: 41
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 38
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBIG vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QBIG	PPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	1.30	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	1.96	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.23	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.84	1.91	-1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.47	5.24	-2.77

QBIG vs. PPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBIG Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the PPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBIG and PPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QBIG vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBIG drawdown since its inception was -30.33%, smaller than the maximum PPA drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBIG and PPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBIG	PPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.33%	-57.37%	+27.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.70%	-13.71%	-5.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.24%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.37%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.09%	-7.39%	-6.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.07%	-9.18%	+2.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.67%	4.97%	+1.70%

Volatility

QBIG vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) is 7.46%, while Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a volatility of 7.99%. This indicates that QBIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QBIG	PPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.46%	7.99%	-0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.78%	16.83%	-1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.53%	20.14%	+0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.42%	18.70%	+8.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.42%	20.72%	+6.70%

QBIG vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBIG has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PPA's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

QBIG vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison

QBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF	0.37%	0.42%	0.61%	0.67%	0.83%	0.59%	0.88%	0.95%	0.90%	0.67%	1.70%	1.41%
QBIG Invesco Top QQQ ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBIG and PPA in my portfolio?

QBIG and PPA have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QBIG or PPA?

PPA has higher volatility (7.99%) compared to QBIG (7.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBIG dropped -30.33% vs PPA's -57.37%.

Which ETF is better, QBIG or PPA?

On 1-year performance, PPA leads with 26.01% vs 16.43% for QBIG. On fees, QBIG is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QBIG has been the lower-risk option at 7.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QBIG or PPA?

Over the 1-year period, PPA has performed better with a 26.01% return vs 16.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBIG or PPA?

QBIG is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBIG or PPA?

PPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for QBIG.

What is the main difference between QBIG and PPA?

QBIG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PPA is Aerospace & Defense. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QBIG and 0.58% for PPA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.