QBF vs. QSOL
QBF (Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly) and QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QBF is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Innovator, while QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return. QBF is actively managed, while QSOL is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QBF charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QSOL.
Performance
QBF vs. QSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBF achieves a -26.78% return, which is significantly higher than QSOL's -36.90% return.
QBF
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -5.67%
- 6M
- -32.18%
- YTD
- -26.78%
- 1Y
- -42.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QSOL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- 6M
- -46.95%
- YTD
- -36.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBF vs. QSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly | -26.78% | -3.13% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | -36.90% | -4.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBF and QSOL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBF vs. QSOL — Risk / Return Rank
QBF
QSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QBF vs. QSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF) and Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBF | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBF vs. QSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBF drawdown since its inception was -48.71%, smaller than the maximum QSOL drawdown of -56.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBF and QSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBF | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.71% | -56.55% | +7.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.27% | -46.95% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.03% | -35.37% | +16.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.59% | — | — |
Volatility
QBF vs. QSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBF | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.33% | 71.73% | -44.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.02% | 71.73% | -42.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.02% | 71.73% | -42.71% |
QBF vs. QSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QSOL's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBF vs. QSOL - Dividend Comparison
QBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than QSOL's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly | 1.89% | 1.38% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.88% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBF and QSOL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBF.
QBF has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.88% for QSOL.
QBF is categorized as Blockchain, while QSOL is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QBF and 0.25% for QSOL.
Find the right allocation for QBF and QSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer