QBF vs. GFOF
QBF (Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly) and GFOF (Grayscale Future of Finance ETF) are both Blockchain funds. QBF is actively managed, while GFOF is passively managed. QBF charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GFOF.
Performance
QBF vs. GFOF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QBF
- 1D
- -3.18%
- 1M
- -14.78%
- YTD
- -27.01%
- 6M
- -27.39%
- 1Y
- -37.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFOF
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBF vs. GFOF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly | -27.01% | -14.76% |
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBF vs. GFOF — Risk / Return Rank
QBF
GFOF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QBF vs. GFOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF) and Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBF | GFOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBF vs. GFOF - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBF | GFOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.44% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.82% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.21% | — | — |
Volatility
QBF vs. GFOF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBF | GFOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.20% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.01% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.01% | — | — |
QBF vs. GFOF - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GFOF's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBF vs. GFOF - Dividend Comparison
QBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, while GFOF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.55% | 4.08% |
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly | 1.89% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, GFOF is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GFOF is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBF.
QBF has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.00% for GFOF.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QBF and 0.70% for GFOF.
Find the right allocation for QBF and GFOF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer