QBER vs. QQQY
QBER (TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF) and QQQY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QBER is a Options Trading fund actively managed by TrueShares, while QQQY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QBER returned -0.12% vs 29.04% for QQQY. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. QBER charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for QQQY.
Performance
QBER vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBER achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY's 14.69% return.
QBER
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 0.28%
- 1Y
- -0.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQY
- 1D
- -3.21%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- 14.69%
- 6M
- 13.76%
- 1Y
- 29.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBER vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QBER TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF | -0.35% | 0.25% | 0.04% |
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 14.69% | 14.96% | -1.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBER and QQQY is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2024 | -0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBER vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank
QBER
QQQY
QBER vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBER | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.35 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 2.62 | -2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 10.63 | -10.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBER vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBER drawdown since its inception was -5.72%, smaller than the maximum QQQY drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBER and QQQY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBER | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.72% | -19.05% | +13.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.35% | -11.14% | +8.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.11% | -4.03% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -2.91% | -1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 2.74% | -1.68% |
Volatility
QBER vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) is 1.03%, while Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a volatility of 8.51%. This indicates that QBER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBER | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 8.51% | -7.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.87% | 13.62% | -10.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.68% | 15.78% | -12.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.33% | 15.39% | -9.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.33% | 15.39% | -9.06% |
QBER vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBER has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBER vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison
QBER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than QQQY's 35.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QBER TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF | 3.27% | 3.26% | 1.35% | 0.00% |
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 35.60% | 45.34% | 83.34% | 20.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBER and QQQY have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQY has higher volatility (8.51%) compared to QBER (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBER dropped -5.72% vs QQQY's -19.05%.
On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 29.04% vs -0.12% for QBER. On fees, QBER is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QBER has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 29.04% return vs -0.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QBER is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for QQQY.
QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 35.60%, compared with 3.27% for QBER.
QBER is categorized as Options Trading, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QBER and 0.99% for QQQY.
QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QBER and QQQY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer