QBER vs. CAOS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QBER (TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QBER returned -0.85% vs 1.88% for CAOS. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QBER charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.

Performance

QBER vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBER achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than CAOS's 0.82% return.

QBER

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -0.38%
• YTD: -0.96%
• 6M: -0.37%
• 1Y: -0.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CAOS

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 6M: 0.69%
• 1Y: 1.88%
• 3Y*: 4.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBER vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QBER TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF	-0.96%	0.25%	0.04%
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.82%	2.55%	3.07%

Correlation

The correlation between QBER and CAOS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024	0.25

Return for Risk

QBER vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBER

QBER Risk / Return Rank: 6
QBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
QBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
QBER Omega Ratio Rank: 6
QBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
QBER Martin Ratio Rank: 5

CAOS

CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 40
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 39
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBER vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QBER	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	1.24	-1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.31	1.98	-2.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.26	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.36	2.49	-2.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.88	6.22	-7.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QBER vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBER Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBER and CAOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QBER	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23	1.24	-1.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	1.21	-1.26

Drawdowns

QBER vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBER drawdown since its inception was -5.72%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBER and CAOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBER	CAOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.72%	-3.60%	-2.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.35%	-0.76%	-1.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.68%	-1.07%	-4.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.72%	-0.90%	-3.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	0.30%	+0.67%

Volatility

QBER vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) has a higher volatility of 0.87% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.26%. This indicates that QBER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QBER	CAOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.87%	0.26%	+0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.85%	1.03%	+1.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.64%	1.52%	+2.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.40%	4.26%	+2.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.40%	4.26%	+2.14%

QBER vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBER has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

QBER vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

QBER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QBER TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF	3.29%	3.26%	1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBER and CAOS in my portfolio?

QBER and CAOS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QBER or CAOS?

QBER has higher volatility (0.87%) compared to CAOS (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBER dropped -5.72% vs CAOS's -3.60%.

Which ETF is better, QBER or CAOS?

On 1-year performance, CAOS leads with 1.88% vs -0.85% for QBER. On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QBER or CAOS?

Over the 1-year period, CAOS has performed better with a 1.88% return vs -0.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBER or CAOS?

CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBER.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBER or CAOS?

QBER has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

What is the main difference between QBER and CAOS?

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QBER and 0.63% for CAOS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CAOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.