PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QAT vs. EINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QAT vs. EINC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QAT (iShares MSCI Qatar ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QAT is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Qatar Capped Index, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QAT returned 4.43%/yr vs 12.03%/yr for EINC. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QAT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

QAT vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QAT achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 25.97% return. Over the past 10 years, QAT has underperformed EINC with an annualized return of 4.43%, while EINC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.03% annualized return.

QAT

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.08%
YTD
1.01%
6M
0.41%
1Y
7.11%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*
4.43%

EINC

1D
1.37%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
25.97%
6M
25.98%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
30.36%
5Y*
21.18%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QAT vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QAT
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF		1.01%8.81%5.20%2.72%-7.23%14.42%6.94%-0.44%20.03%-11.66%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		25.97%7.11%42.79%15.55%19.18%38.05%-19.89%16.98%-19.85%-3.45%

Correlation

The correlation between QAT and EINC is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2014

0.21

The correlation between QAT and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QAT vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
QAT
EINC

Financial Services

55.5%

-

Basic Materials

12.6%

-

Industrials

8.4%
2.5%

Energy

7.6%
99.4%

Communication Services

6.3%

-

Real Estate

4.0%

-

Utilities

2.5%
0.6%

Technology

1.0%

-

Healthcare

0.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.6%

-

Financial Services

QAT
55.5%
EINC

-

Basic Materials

QAT
12.6%
EINC

-

Industrials

QAT
8.4%
EINC
2.5%

Energy

QAT
7.6%
EINC
99.4%

Communication Services

QAT
6.3%
EINC

-

Real Estate

QAT
4.0%
EINC

-

Utilities

QAT
2.5%
EINC
0.6%

Technology

QAT
1.0%
EINC

-

Healthcare

QAT
0.8%
EINC

-

Consumer Cyclical

QAT
0.7%
EINC

-

Consumer Defensive

QAT
0.6%
EINC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Qatar ETF

VanEck Energy Income ETF

Often compared with QAT:
QAT vs. UAEQAT vs. KSAQAT vs. ENORQAT vs. SJMQAT vs. EDENQAT vs. VOOQAT vs. EIRL
Often compared with EINC:
EINC vs. XLEEINC vs. BIZDEINC vs. EMLPEINC vs. SMHEINC vs. IXCEINC vs. VPUEINC vs. ERY

Return for Risk

QAT vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QAT
QAT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
QAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAT Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
QAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAT Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QAT vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

QATEINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.54
1.99

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.87
2.67

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.35

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

3.80

-3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.24

9.63

-8.39

QAT vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QAT and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QAT vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QAT drawdown since its inception was -45.21%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAT and EINC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QATEINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.21%

-87.55%

+42.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.60%

-7.89%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.41%

-16.01%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.17%

-19.87%

-13.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.04%

-68.85%

+34.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.55%

-4.50%

-7.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.14%

-44.15%

+25.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

3.10%

+2.65%

Volatility

QAT vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) is 5.72%, while VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that QAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QATEINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.72%

6.51%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.06%

11.88%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.25%

15.10%

-1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.06%

19.54%

-4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

25.43%

-7.89%

QAT vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QAT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

QAT vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

QAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than EINC's 3.51% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		3.51%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
QAT
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF		4.63%3.51%5.90%3.92%4.78%2.33%2.63%3.57%4.63%4.10%3.51%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

QAT and EINC have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EINC has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to QAT (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QAT dropped -45.21% vs EINC's -87.55%.

On 10-year performance, EINC leads with 12.03% vs 4.43% for QAT. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, QAT has been the lower-risk option at 5.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EINC has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 4.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for QAT.

QAT has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 3.51% for EINC.

QAT is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. QAT tracks MSCI All Qatar Capped Index, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for QAT and 0.45% for EINC.

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QAT and EINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer