QARP vs. USSG
QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) and USSG (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Deutsche Bank - QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index while USSG tracks the MSCI USA ESG Leaders. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QARP returned 12.06%/yr vs 13.79%/yr for USSG. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QARP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for USSG.
Performance
QARP vs. USSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QARP achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly higher than USSG's 9.51% return.
QARP
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 25.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 12.06%
- 10Y*
- —
USSG
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 6M
- 10.19%
- 1Y
- 27.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.79%
- 10Y*
- —
QARP vs. USSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 10.34% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 18.00% |
USSG Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 9.51% | 18.97% | 23.45% | 29.17% | -20.33% | 31.83% | 18.71% | 19.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between QARP and USSG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019 | 0.91 |
The correlation between QARP and USSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
QARP vs. USSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QARP
USSG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
QARP
USSG
Communication Services
QARP
USSG
Consumer Cyclical
QARP
USSG
Healthcare
QARP
USSG
Consumer Defensive
QARP
USSG
Financial Services
QARP
USSG
Industrials
QARP
USSG
Energy
QARP
USSG
Basic Materials
QARP
USSG
Real Estate
QARP
USSG
Utilities
QARP
USSG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QARP vs. USSG — Risk / Return Rank
QARP
USSG
QARP vs. USSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QARP | USSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.38 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 2.50 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.79 | 10.72 | +5.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QARP | USSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.14 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.79 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.84 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
QARP vs. USSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, roughly equal to the maximum USSG drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and USSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QARP | USSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.44% | -34.10% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | -11.20% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.65% | -20.00% | +4.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | -27.00% | +4.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -1.21% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -5.60% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 2.61% | -1.02% |
Volatility
QARP vs. USSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) is 2.21%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) has a volatility of 3.77%. This indicates that QARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QARP | USSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 3.77% | -1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.71% | 10.04% | -2.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.36% | 13.12% | -2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 17.59% | -2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 20.16% | -0.51% |
QARP vs. USSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than USSG's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QARP vs. USSG - Dividend Comparison
QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than USSG's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.03% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% |
USSG Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 0.95% | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.13% | 1.42% | 1.21% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QARP and USSG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USSG has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to QARP (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QARP dropped -35.44% vs USSG's -34.10%.
On 5-year performance, USSG leads with 13.79% vs 12.06% for QARP. On fees, USSG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USSG has performed better with a 13.79% return vs 12.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USSG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.
QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.95% for USSG.
QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index, while USSG tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QARP and 0.10% for USSG.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QARP and USSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer