PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QARP vs. SHYL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QARP vs. SHYL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QARP achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly higher than SHYL's 1.15% return.


QARP

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.39%
YTD
10.34%
6M
10.57%
1Y
25.02%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*

SHYL

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.16%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.57%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
8.28%
5Y*
4.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QARP vs. SHYL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
10.34%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%14.83%30.70%-5.53%
SHYL
Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF
1.15%7.78%8.52%11.39%-5.21%4.60%3.64%10.16%-0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between QARP and SHYL is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018

0.69

The correlation between QARP and SHYL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QARP vs. SHYL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SHYL
SHYL Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SHYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYL Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYL Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QARP vs. SHYL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QARPSHYLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.38

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

3.81

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.79

15.01

+0.78

QARP vs. SHYL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QARP Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the SHYL Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QARP and SHYL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QARPSHYLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

1.90

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.84

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.72

0.00

Drawdowns

QARP vs. SHYL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, which is greater than SHYL's maximum drawdown of -19.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and SHYL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QARPSHYLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.44%

-19.26%

-16.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

-1.59%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.65%

-4.73%

-10.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-9.60%

-13.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-0.23%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.44%

-1.54%

-2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

0.40%

+1.19%

Volatility

QARP vs. SHYL - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) has a higher volatility of 2.21% compared to Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL) at 0.85%. This indicates that QARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHYL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QARPSHYLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

0.85%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

2.45%

+5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.36%

3.20%

+7.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

5.84%

+9.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

6.69%

+12.96%

QARP vs. SHYL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SHYL's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QARP vs. SHYL - Dividend Comparison

QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than SHYL's 6.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.03%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%
SHYL
Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF
6.94%7.02%7.26%6.60%5.52%4.65%6.16%5.93%5.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


QARP and SHYL have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QARP has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to SHYL (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QARP dropped -35.44% vs SHYL's -19.26%.

On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 12.06% vs 4.87% for SHYL. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, SHYL has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 12.06% return vs 4.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SHYL.

SHYL has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 1.03% for QARP.

QARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SHYL is High Yield Bonds. QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index, while SHYL tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market 0-5 Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QARP and 0.20% for SHYL.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QARP and SHYL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer