QARP vs. NACP
QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) and NACP (Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index while NACP tracks the Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QARP returned 12.06%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for NACP. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QARP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NACP.
Performance
QARP vs. NACP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QARP achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 22.18% return.
QARP
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 25.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 12.06%
- 10Y*
- —
NACP
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 9.92%
- YTD
- 22.18%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 43.81%
- 3Y*
- 27.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- —
QARP vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 10.34% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -10.60% |
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 22.18% | 21.38% | 23.93% | 29.69% | -23.05% | 27.62% | 26.00% | 30.74% | -8.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between QARP and NACP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2018 | 0.87 |
The correlation between QARP and NACP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
QARP vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QARP
NACP
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
QARP
NACP
Communication Services
QARP
NACP
Consumer Cyclical
QARP
NACP
Healthcare
QARP
NACP
Consumer Defensive
QARP
NACP
Financial Services
QARP
NACP
Industrials
QARP
NACP
Energy
QARP
NACP
Basic Materials
QARP
NACP
Real Estate
QARP
NACP
Utilities
QARP
NACP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QARP vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank
QARP
NACP
QARP vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QARP | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | 3.14 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.46 | 4.17 | -0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.54 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 4.56 | -1.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.79 | 20.04 | -4.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QARP | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 3.14 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.92 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.93 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
QARP vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, which is greater than NACP's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and NACP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QARP | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.44% | -30.96% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | -9.65% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.65% | -19.66% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | -27.89% | +5.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -0.13% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -5.75% | +1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 2.19% | -0.60% |
Volatility
QARP vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) is 2.21%, while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that QARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QARP | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 4.44% | -2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.71% | 11.13% | -3.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.36% | 14.02% | -3.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 17.47% | -1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 18.70% | +0.95% |
QARP vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
QARP vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison
QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than NACP's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 0.55% | 0.62% | 2.96% | 1.28% | 3.48% | 3.06% | 1.48% | 1.22% | 0.71% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.03% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QARP and NACP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NACP has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to QARP (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QARP dropped -35.44% vs NACP's -30.96%.
On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 15.98% vs 12.06% for QARP. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 12.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.
QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.
QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QARP and 0.49% for NACP.
NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QARP and NACP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer