QARP vs. JQUA
QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) and JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index while JQUA tracks the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QARP returned 11.83%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for JQUA. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QARP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JQUA.
Performance
QARP vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QARP achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly lower than JQUA's 14.93% return.
QARP
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.16%
JQUA
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 13.64%
- YTD
- 14.93%
- 1Y
- 22.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $26.79M | $28.22M | $36.46M | |
| $110.48K | $118.49K | $177.11K |
QARP vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 13.09% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -5.53% |
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 14.93% | 11.69% | 21.21% | 25.13% | -13.45% | 28.68% | 16.56% | 28.47% | -1.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between QARP and JQUA is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.90 |
The correlation between QARP and JQUA shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QARP vs. JQUA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QARP
JQUA
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
QARP
JQUA
Healthcare
QARP
JQUA
Financial Services
QARP
JQUA
Communication Services
QARP
JQUA
Consumer Defensive
QARP
JQUA
Consumer Cyclical
QARP
JQUA
Industrials
QARP
JQUA
Energy
QARP
JQUA
Basic Materials
QARP
JQUA
Utilities
QARP
JQUA
Real Estate
QARP
JQUA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QARP vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank
QARP
JQUA
QARP vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QARP | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.30 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 2.95 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.08 | 12.05 | +3.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QARP vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, which is greater than JQUA's maximum drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and JQUA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QARP | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.44% | -32.92% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | -7.13% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.65% | -16.81% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | -22.47% | -0.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.36% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.37% | -4.10% | -0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 1.74% | -0.12% |
Volatility
QARP vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) at 2.34%. This indicates that QARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JQUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QARP | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 2.34% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 9.47% | -1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 12.04% | -1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.52% | 15.72% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.51% | 17.93% | +1.58% |
QARP vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison
QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QARP vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison
QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than JQUA's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.08% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 2.10% | 0.40% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QARP and JQUA have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QARP has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to JQUA (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QARP dropped -35.44% vs JQUA's -32.92%.
On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 12.89% vs 11.83% for QARP. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JQUA has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 12.89% return vs 11.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.
JQUA has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 1.02% for QARP.
QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index, while JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QARP and 0.12% for JQUA.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QARP and JQUA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer