QARP vs. GRW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QARP is a Quality Factor fund tracking the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index, while GRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TCW. QARP is passively managed, while GRW is actively managed. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QARP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

QARP vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QARP

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 1.69%
• 6M: 8.81%
• YTD: 13.09%
• 1Y: 25.79%
• 3Y*: 16.68%
• 5Y*: 11.83%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.16%

GRW

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: -1.32%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	$173.33K	$124.39K	$212.92K
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF	$110.48K	$118.49K	$177.11K

QARP vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF	1.70%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between QARP and GRW is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.47

QARP vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QARP	GRW
Technology	24.1%	26.9%
Healthcare	14.0%	3.7%
Financial Services	12.4%	8.8%
Communication Services	10.5%	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	9.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	7.5%
Industrials	7.9%	41.5%
Energy	6.3%	-
Basic Materials	2.5%	3.9%
Utilities	1.9%	-
Real Estate	1.0%	-

Return for Risk

QARP vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QARP

QARP Risk / Return Rank: 90
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 89
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

GRW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QARP vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QARP	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.37	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.08	—	—

Drawdowns

QARP vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -4.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	QARP	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.44%	-4.12%	-31.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-1.85%	+1.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.37%	-1.73%	-2.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QARP	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.59%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.16%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.71%	15.72%	-5.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.52%	15.72%	-0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.51%	15.72%	+3.79%

QARP vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

QARP vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF	1.02%	1.14%	1.39%	1.28%	1.68%	1.34%	1.61%	1.85%	1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QARP and GRW in my portfolio?

QARP and GRW have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QARP or GRW?

On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QARP or GRW?

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QARP or GRW?

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between QARP and GRW?

QARP is categorized as Quality Factor, while GRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QARP and 0.75% for GRW.