QARP vs. GARP
QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) and GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index while GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QARP returned 12.06%/yr vs 20.26%/yr for GARP. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QARP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GARP.
Performance
QARP vs. GARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QARP achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 21.29% return.
QARP
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 25.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 12.06%
- 10Y*
- —
GARP
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 11.92%
- YTD
- 21.29%
- 6M
- 21.80%
- 1Y
- 43.57%
- 3Y*
- 33.60%
- 5Y*
- 20.26%
- 10Y*
- —
QARP vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 10.34% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 11.70% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 21.29% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between QARP and GARP is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020 | 0.81 |
The correlation between QARP and GARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
QARP vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QARP
GARP
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
QARP
GARP
Communication Services
QARP
GARP
Consumer Cyclical
QARP
GARP
Healthcare
QARP
GARP
Consumer Defensive
QARP
GARP
-
Financial Services
QARP
GARP
Industrials
QARP
GARP
Energy
QARP
GARP
Basic Materials
QARP
GARP
Real Estate
QARP
GARP
Utilities
QARP
GARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QARP vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank
QARP
GARP
QARP vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QARP | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | 2.45 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.46 | 3.18 | +0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.41 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 3.20 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.79 | 12.85 | +2.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QARP | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.45 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.93 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.90 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
QARP vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, which is greater than GARP's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and GARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QARP | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.44% | -31.34% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | -13.69% | +6.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.65% | -23.73% | +8.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | -30.61% | +7.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -0.73% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -7.36% | +2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 3.40% | -1.81% |
Volatility
QARP vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) is 2.21%, while iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a volatility of 5.03%. This indicates that QARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QARP | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 5.03% | -2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.71% | 13.89% | -6.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.36% | 17.89% | -7.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 21.97% | -6.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 23.89% | -4.24% |
QARP vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QARP vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison
QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than GARP's 0.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.03% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QARP and GARP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GARP has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to QARP (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QARP dropped -35.44% vs GARP's -31.34%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 20.26% vs 12.06% for QARP. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 20.26% return vs 12.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.
QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.25% for GARP.
QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index, while GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QARP and 0.15% for GARP.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QARP and GARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer