QALT vs. DOGG
QALT (SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF) and DOGG (FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QALT is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by SEI, while DOGG is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by FT Vest. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. QALT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DOGG.
Performance
QALT vs. DOGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QALT achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly lower than DOGG's 9.21% return.
QALT
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOGG
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 12.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QALT vs. DOGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QALT SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 6.91% | 53.86% |
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF | 9.21% | 6.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between QALT and DOGG is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QALT vs. DOGG — Risk / Return Rank
QALT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DOGG
QALT vs. DOGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (QALT) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QALT | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.19 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.69 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QALT vs. DOGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QALT drawdown since its inception was -4.85%, smaller than the maximum DOGG drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QALT and DOGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QALT | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -11.19% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -4.01% | +3.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.28% | -3.27% | +1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.86% | — |
Volatility
QALT vs. DOGG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QALT | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.34% | 11.02% | +39.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.34% | 12.99% | +37.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.34% | 12.99% | +37.35% |
QALT vs. DOGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QALT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DOGG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QALT vs. DOGG - Dividend Comparison
QALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, less than DOGG's 8.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF | 8.66% | 8.75% | 9.92% | 5.89% |
QALT SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 6.03% | 5.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QALT and DOGG have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DOGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DOGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for QALT.
DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.66%, compared with 6.03% for QALT.
QALT is categorized as Multistrategy, while DOGG is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: SEI and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for QALT and 0.75% for DOGG.
Find the right allocation for QALT and DOGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer