PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QALT vs. DOGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QALT vs. DOGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (QALT) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QALT achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly lower than DOGG's 9.21% return.


QALT

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.87%
6M
4.92%
YTD
6.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DOGG

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.18%
6M
7.96%
YTD
9.21%
1Y
18.09%
3Y*
12.95%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QALT vs. DOGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QALT and DOGG is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QALT vs. DOGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QALT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DOGG
DOGG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DOGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOGG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
DOGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QALT vs. DOGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (QALT) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QALTDOGGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.69

QALT vs. DOGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QALT vs. DOGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QALT drawdown since its inception was -4.85%, smaller than the maximum DOGG drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QALT and DOGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QALTDOGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-11.19%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-4.01%

+3.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.28%

-3.27%

+1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

Volatility

QALT vs. DOGG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QALTDOGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.34%

11.02%

+39.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.34%

12.99%

+37.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.34%

12.99%

+37.35%

QALT vs. DOGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QALT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DOGG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QALT vs. DOGG - Dividend Comparison

QALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, less than DOGG's 8.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
8.66%8.75%9.92%5.89%
QALT
SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF
6.03%5.15%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QALT and DOGG have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DOGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DOGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for QALT.

DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.66%, compared with 6.03% for QALT.

QALT is categorized as Multistrategy, while DOGG is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: SEI and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for QALT and 0.75% for DOGG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QALT and DOGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer