QALT vs. BITI
QALT (SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QALT is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by SEI, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. QALT is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.38, they often move in opposite directions. QALT charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.
Performance
QALT vs. BITI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QALT achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 28.75% return.
QALT
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITI
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 34.68%
- YTD
- 28.75%
- 1Y
- 68.34%
- 3Y*
- -30.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QALT vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QALT SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 6.91% | 53.86% |
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 28.75% | 29.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between QALT and BITI is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025 | -0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QALT vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank
QALT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BITI
QALT vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (QALT) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QALT | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.72 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.78 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QALT vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QALT drawdown since its inception was -4.85%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QALT and BITI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QALT | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -92.16% | +87.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -85.94% | +85.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.28% | -68.34% | +67.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.11% | — |
Volatility
QALT vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QALT | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.34% | 44.14% | +6.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.34% | 52.28% | -1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.34% | 52.28% | -1.94% |
QALT vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QALT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
QALT vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison
QALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, less than BITI's 15.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 15.10% | 1.60% | 3.91% | 3.33% | 0.06% |
QALT SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 6.03% | 5.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QALT and BITI have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QALT is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QALT is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.
BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 6.03% for QALT.
QALT is categorized as Multistrategy, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: SEI and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for QALT and 1.03% for BITI.
Find the right allocation for QALT and BITI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer