QALT vs. AGZD
QALT (SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF) and AGZD (WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QALT is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by SEI, while AGZD is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Zero Duration. QALT is actively managed, while AGZD is passively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QALT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for AGZD.
Performance
QALT vs. AGZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QALT achieves a 6.20% return, which is significantly higher than AGZD's 2.38% return.
QALT
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 6.20%
- 6M
- 7.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGZD
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- 1Y
- 5.37%
- 3Y*
- 6.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.35%
- 10Y*
- 3.21%
QALT vs. AGZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QALT SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 6.20% | 4.91% |
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 2.38% | 2.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between QALT and AGZD is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QALT vs. AGZD — Risk / Return Rank
QALT
AGZD
QALT vs. AGZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (QALT) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QALT | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.97 | 0.65 | +1.33 |
Drawdowns
QALT vs. AGZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QALT drawdown since its inception was -4.85%, smaller than the maximum AGZD drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QALT and AGZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QALT | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -8.46% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.24% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -0.77% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.28% | — |
Volatility
QALT vs. AGZD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QALT | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.61% | 2.89% | +4.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.61% | 3.59% | +4.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.61% | 3.72% | +3.89% |
QALT vs. AGZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QALT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than AGZD's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
QALT vs. AGZD - Dividend Comparison
QALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than AGZD's 3.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 3.98% | 4.12% | 3.96% | 6.07% | 8.61% | 1.66% | 2.28% | 2.83% | 2.62% | 2.31% | 1.81% | 1.66% |
QALT SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 5.46% | 5.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QALT and AGZD have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AGZD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AGZD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for QALT.
QALT has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 3.98% for AGZD.
QALT is categorized as Multistrategy, while AGZD is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: SEI and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for QALT and 0.23% for AGZD.
Find the right allocation for QALT and AGZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer