QABA vs. KBE
QABA (First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund) and KBE (SPDR S&P Bank ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - QABA tracks the NASDAQ OMX ABA Community Bank Index while KBE tracks the S&P Banks Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QABA returned 6.80%/yr vs 9.19%/yr for KBE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QABA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KBE.
Performance
QABA vs. KBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QABA achieves a 8.16% return, which is significantly higher than KBE's 2.87% return. Over the past 10 years, QABA has underperformed KBE with an annualized return of 6.80%, while KBE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.19% annualized return.
QABA
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 8.16%
- 6M
- 7.37%
- 1Y
- 18.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.09%
- 10Y*
- 6.80%
KBE
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- 2.87%
- 6M
- 4.27%
- 1Y
- 18.75%
- 3Y*
- 22.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
QABA vs. KBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QABA First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund | 8.16% | 4.62% | 14.49% | -2.18% | -9.01% | 34.20% | -10.70% | 22.85% | -16.47% | 0.75% |
KBE SPDR S&P Bank ETF | 2.87% | 12.36% | 23.78% | 5.30% | -14.83% | 33.46% | -8.75% | 29.78% | -19.65% | 10.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between QABA and KBE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2009 | 0.92 |
The correlation between QABA and KBE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
QABA vs. KBE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QABA
KBE
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
QABA
KBE
Industrials
QABA
KBE
-
Basic Materials
QABA
-
KBE
-
Communication Services
QABA
-
KBE
-
Consumer Cyclical
QABA
-
KBE
-
Consumer Defensive
QABA
-
KBE
-
Energy
QABA
-
KBE
-
Healthcare
QABA
-
KBE
-
Real Estate
QABA
-
KBE
-
Technology
QABA
-
KBE
-
Utilities
QABA
-
KBE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QABA vs. KBE — Risk / Return Rank
QABA
KBE
QABA vs. KBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) and SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QABA | KBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.29 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.69 | 3.39 | +0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QABA | KBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.87 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.19 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.31 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.10 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
QABA vs. KBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QABA drawdown since its inception was -49.30%, smaller than the maximum KBE drawdown of -83.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QABA and KBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QABA | KBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.30% | -83.15% | +33.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.49% | -14.63% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.82% | -25.97% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.93% | -45.25% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.30% | -53.14% | +3.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.25% | -7.38% | +3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | -27.54% | +16.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 5.55% | -0.53% |
Volatility
QABA vs. KBE - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) and SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) have volatilities of 5.63% and 5.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QABA | KBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 5.65% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.22% | 14.93% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.50% | 21.62% | +0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.50% | 27.36% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.69% | 29.85% | -1.16% |
QABA vs. KBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QABA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than KBE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QABA vs. KBE - Dividend Comparison
QABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, which matches KBE's 2.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBE SPDR S&P Bank ETF | 2.39% | 2.51% | 2.35% | 2.78% | 2.99% | 2.16% | 2.44% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.36% | 1.39% | 1.70% |
QABA First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund | 2.40% | 2.52% | 2.37% | 2.71% | 2.10% | 1.68% | 2.55% | 1.95% | 1.90% | 1.42% | 1.13% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, QABA and KBE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
KBE has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to QABA (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QABA dropped -49.30% vs KBE's -83.15%.
On 10-year performance, KBE leads with 9.19% vs 6.80% for QABA. On fees, KBE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, KBE has performed better with a 9.19% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KBE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QABA.
QABA and KBE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.40%.
QABA tracks NASDAQ OMX ABA Community Bank Index, while KBE tracks S&P Banks Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QABA and 0.35% for KBE.
KBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QABA and KBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer