Q vs. AMAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Qnity Electronics, Inc (Q) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT).
Performance
Q vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Q vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
Q Qnity Electronics, Inc | 41.40% | -15.76% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 33.16% | 8.32% |
Fundamentals
Q:
$3.53
AMAT:
$9.73
Q:
32.66
AMAT:
35.13
Q:
29.83
AMAT:
4.47
Q:
5.18
AMAT:
9.76
Q:
$4.67B
AMAT:
$28.21B
Q:
$2.05B
AMAT:
$13.75B
Q:
$1.36B
AMAT:
$9.59B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, Q achieves a 41.40% return, which is significantly higher than AMAT's 33.16% return.
Q
- 1D
- 7.72%
- 1M
- -8.98%
- YTD
- 41.40%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMAT
- 1D
- 5.78%
- 1M
- -8.20%
- YTD
- 33.16%
- 6M
- 67.47%
- 1Y
- 137.63%
- 3Y*
- 41.87%
- 5Y*
- 20.31%
- 10Y*
- 33.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
Q vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank
Q
AMAT
Q vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Qnity Electronics, Inc (Q) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| Q | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.41 | +0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between Q and AMAT is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
Q vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison
Q's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than AMAT's 0.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q Qnity Electronics, Inc | 0.12% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.54% | 0.69% | 0.93% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
Q vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum Q drawdown since its inception was -27.12%, smaller than the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for Q and AMAT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| Q | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.12% | -85.22% | +58.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.98% | -13.46% | +4.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.95% | -38.96% | +28.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.67% | — |
Volatility
Q vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| Q | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.30% | 49.10% | +8.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.30% | 43.28% | +14.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.30% | 42.40% | +14.90% |
Financials
Q vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Qnity Electronics, Inc and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Q vs. AMAT - Profitability Comparison
Q - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Qnity Electronics, Inc reported a gross profit of 524.00M and revenue of 1.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.1%.
AMAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.44B and revenue of 7.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.
Q - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Qnity Electronics, Inc reported an operating income of 273.00M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.4%.
AMAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.10B and revenue of 7.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.9%.
Q - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Qnity Electronics, Inc reported a net income of 211.00M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
AMAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 2.03B and revenue of 7.01B, resulting in a net margin of 28.9%.