PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PZVSX vs. BOSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PZVSX vs. BOSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pzena Small Cap Value Fund (PZVSX) and Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZVSX achieves a 17.97% return, which is significantly lower than BOSVX's 20.67% return.


PZVSX

1D
1.13%
1M
5.03%
YTD
17.97%
6M
15.64%
1Y
27.26%
3Y*
10.66%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*

BOSVX

1D
1.06%
1M
2.43%
YTD
20.67%
6M
18.20%
1Y
44.73%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
11.31%
10Y*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PZVSX vs. BOSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PZVSX
Pzena Small Cap Value Fund
17.97%-4.94%1.62%25.62%-5.33%27.93%-0.09%24.84%-15.19%2.10%
BOSVX
Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund
20.67%9.78%4.21%18.18%-4.27%48.03%0.83%13.90%-17.15%5.91%

Correlation

The correlation between PZVSX and BOSVX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.94

The correlation between PZVSX and BOSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PZVSX vs. BOSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PZVSX
PZVSX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
PZVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PZVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

BOSVX
BOSVX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BOSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BOSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZVSX vs. BOSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena Small Cap Value Fund (PZVSX) and Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PZVSXBOSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.40

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

5.37

-3.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.48

15.71

-11.23

PZVSX vs. BOSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZVSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the BOSVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZVSX and BOSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PZVSX vs. BOSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZVSX drawdown since its inception was -54.22%, smaller than the maximum BOSVX drawdown of -57.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZVSX and BOSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PZVSXBOSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.22%

-57.14%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.26%

-8.27%

-6.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.43%

-28.71%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.43%

-28.71%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-2.23%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.44%

-8.55%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.10%

2.82%

+3.28%

Volatility

PZVSX vs. BOSVX - Volatility Comparison

Pzena Small Cap Value Fund (PZVSX) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX) at 5.03%. This indicates that PZVSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PZVSXBOSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

5.03%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.75%

13.55%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.08%

19.80%

+2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.27%

22.59%

+1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.44%

25.06%

+2.38%

PZVSX vs. BOSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZVSX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than BOSVX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PZVSX vs. BOSVX - Dividend Comparison

PZVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than BOSVX's 8.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOSVX
Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund
8.27%9.99%9.71%8.55%21.96%4.12%1.21%0.99%10.36%6.66%0.89%1.00%
PZVSX
Pzena Small Cap Value Fund
1.98%2.33%7.03%0.45%17.31%1.25%1.39%0.00%4.56%7.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PZVSX and BOSVX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PZVSX has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to BOSVX (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZVSX dropped -54.22% vs BOSVX's -57.14%.

BOSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PZVSX and BOSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer