PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PZVSX vs. PZVMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PZVSX vs. PZVMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pzena Small Cap Value Fund (PZVSX) and Pzena Mid Cap Value Fund (PZVMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZVSX achieves a 14.33% return, which is significantly higher than PZVMX's 11.57% return.


PZVSX

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.89%
YTD
14.33%
6M
13.68%
1Y
24.45%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
5.16%
10Y*

PZVMX

1D
0.47%
1M
4.11%
YTD
11.57%
6M
13.25%
1Y
15.38%
3Y*
9.94%
5Y*
4.58%
10Y*
9.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PZVSX vs. PZVMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PZVSX
Pzena Small Cap Value Fund
14.33%-4.94%1.62%25.62%-5.33%27.93%-0.09%24.84%-15.19%2.10%
PZVMX
Pzena Mid Cap Value Fund
11.57%-1.16%0.62%21.03%-5.95%30.68%6.30%29.04%-21.54%13.30%

Correlation

The correlation between PZVSX and PZVMX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.93

The correlation between PZVSX and PZVMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PZVSX vs. PZVMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PZVSX
PZVSX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PZVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PZVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

PZVMX
PZVMX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PZVMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZVMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZVMX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PZVMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZVMX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZVSX vs. PZVMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena Small Cap Value Fund (PZVSX) and Pzena Mid Cap Value Fund (PZVMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PZVSXPZVMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

0.77

+0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.64

1.24

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.14

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

1.00

+0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.60

2.62

+0.98

PZVSX vs. PZVMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZVSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the PZVMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZVSX and PZVMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PZVSXPZVMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

0.77

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.22

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.33

-0.10

Drawdowns

PZVSX vs. PZVMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZVSX drawdown since its inception was -54.22%, roughly equal to the maximum PZVMX drawdown of -54.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZVSX and PZVMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PZVSXPZVMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.22%

-54.06%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.26%

-14.13%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.43%

-23.13%

-9.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.43%

-23.33%

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

0.00%

-1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.50%

-8.46%

-2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.13%

5.39%

+0.74%

Volatility

PZVSX vs. PZVMX - Volatility Comparison

Pzena Small Cap Value Fund (PZVSX) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to Pzena Mid Cap Value Fund (PZVMX) at 4.60%. This indicates that PZVSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PZVMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PZVSXPZVMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

4.60%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.58%

13.67%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.28%

19.28%

+3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.31%

21.16%

+3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.48%

25.22%

+2.26%

PZVSX vs. PZVMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZVSX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than PZVMX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

PZVSX vs. PZVMX - Dividend Comparison

PZVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than PZVMX's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PZVMX
Pzena Mid Cap Value Fund
3.83%4.27%18.45%8.81%15.42%9.39%2.13%1.23%2.59%2.55%0.58%3.43%
PZVSX
Pzena Small Cap Value Fund
2.04%2.33%7.03%0.45%17.31%1.25%1.39%0.00%4.56%7.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PZVSX and PZVMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PZVSX has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to PZVMX (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZVSX dropped -54.22% vs PZVMX's -54.06%.

PZVSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PZVSX and PZVMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer