PZT vs. VTEC
PZT (Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF) and VTEC (Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - PZT tracks the ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni while VTEC tracks the S&P California AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PZT returned 7.43% vs 4.86% for VTEC. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PZT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VTEC.
Performance
PZT vs. VTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZT achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly higher than VTEC's 0.33% return.
PZT
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- 3.09%
- 5Y*
- -0.46%
- 10Y*
- 1.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.93%
VTEC
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- 6M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 4.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $521.98K | $591.10K | $628.19K | |
| $33.00M | $34.10M | $32.23M |
PZT vs. VTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 1.69% | 1.76% | 1.59% |
VTEC Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 0.33% | 3.98% | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZT and VTEC is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.64 |
The correlation between PZT and VTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZT vs. VTEC — Risk / Return Rank
PZT
VTEC
PZT vs. VTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) and Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PZT | VTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.39 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 1.71 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.58 | 5.25 | +2.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PZT vs. VTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZT drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, which is greater than VTEC's maximum drawdown of -4.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZT and VTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZT | VTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.73% | -4.50% | -18.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | -2.85% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | -1.46% | -1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.89% | -1.10% | -2.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 0.93% | +0.05% |
Volatility
PZT vs. VTEC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) has a higher volatility of 1.73% compared to Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEC) at 0.93%. This indicates that PZT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZT | VTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.73% | 0.93% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.86% | 2.09% | +1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.64% | 2.64% | +2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.68% | 3.69% | +2.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.94% | 3.69% | +3.25% |
PZT vs. VTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than VTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
PZT vs. VTEC - Dividend Comparison
PZT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than VTEC's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 3.70% | 3.43% | 3.04% | 2.82% | 2.66% | 2.77% | 2.55% | 2.73% | 3.01% | 2.94% | 3.36% | 3.40% |
VTEC Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.20% | 3.13% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PZT and VTEC have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PZT has higher volatility (1.73%) compared to VTEC (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZT dropped -22.73% vs VTEC's -4.50%.
On 1-year performance, PZT leads with 7.43% vs 4.86% for VTEC. On fees, VTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VTEC has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PZT has performed better with a 7.43% return vs 4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for PZT.
PZT has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 3.20% for VTEC.
PZT tracks ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni, while VTEC tracks S&P California AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for PZT and 0.08% for VTEC.
VTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PZT and VTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer