PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PZT vs. FTABX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PZTFTABX
YTD Return2.05%2.06%
1Y Return8.69%7.56%
3Y Return (Ann)-1.21%-0.46%
5Y Return (Ann)0.87%1.23%
10Y Return (Ann)2.49%2.45%
Sharpe Ratio1.481.96
Sortino Ratio2.222.91
Omega Ratio1.281.46
Calmar Ratio0.770.82
Martin Ratio7.387.96
Ulcer Index1.32%0.89%
Daily Std Dev6.60%3.63%
Max Drawdown-22.73%-15.78%
Current Drawdown-5.01%-2.33%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between PZT and FTABX is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

PZT vs. FTABX - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PZT having a 2.05% return and FTABX slightly higher at 2.06%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PZT having a 2.49% annualized return and FTABX not far behind at 2.45%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.26%
1.90%
PZT
FTABX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PZT vs. FTABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FTABX's 0.25% expense ratio.


PZT
Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for PZT: current value at 0.28% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.28%
Expense ratio chart for FTABX: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PZT vs. FTABX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) and Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PZT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PZT, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PZT, currently valued at 1.84, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.84
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PZT, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PZT, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.70
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PZT, currently valued at 6.01, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.006.01
FTABX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FTABX, currently valued at 1.96, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.96
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FTABX, currently valued at 2.91, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.91
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FTABX, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FTABX, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.82
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FTABX, currently valued at 7.96, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.007.96

PZT vs. FTABX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZT Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the FTABX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZT and FTABX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.22
1.96
PZT
FTABX

Dividends

PZT vs. FTABX - Dividend Comparison

PZT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than FTABX's 3.00% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PZT
Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
2.95%2.82%2.66%2.77%2.55%2.73%3.01%2.94%3.37%3.40%3.75%4.17%
FTABX
Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund
3.00%2.90%2.85%2.40%2.60%2.84%3.02%3.07%3.37%3.58%3.62%3.86%

Drawdowns

PZT vs. FTABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZT drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, which is greater than FTABX's maximum drawdown of -15.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZT and FTABX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.01%
-2.33%
PZT
FTABX

Volatility

PZT vs. FTABX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) has a higher volatility of 2.08% compared to Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX) at 1.84%. This indicates that PZT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.08%
1.84%
PZT
FTABX