PZT vs. PUSH
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH).
PZT and PUSH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PZT is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni. It was launched on Oct 11, 2007. PUSH is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Jun 24, 2024.
Performance
PZT vs. PUSH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PZT vs. PUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 0.25% | 1.76% | 0.43% |
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF | 0.65% | 4.16% | 1.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZT achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than PUSH's 0.65% return.
PZT
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 2.84%
- 3Y*
- 2.31%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- 1.83%
PUSH
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 3.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PZT vs. PUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than PUSH's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PZT vs. PUSH — Risk / Return Rank
PZT
PUSH
PZT vs. PUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PZT | PUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 2.21 | -1.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.59 | 3.22 | -2.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.59 | -0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 4.40 | -3.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.67 | 15.49 | -13.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PZT | PUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 2.21 | -1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 2.84 | -2.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between PZT and PUSH is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PZT vs. PUSH - Dividend Comparison
PZT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than PUSH's 3.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 3.57% | 3.43% | 3.04% | 2.82% | 2.66% | 2.77% | 2.55% | 2.73% | 3.01% | 2.94% | 3.36% | 3.40% |
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF | 3.31% | 3.45% | 1.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PZT vs. PUSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZT drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, which is greater than PUSH's maximum drawdown of -0.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZT and PUSH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZT | PUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.73% | -0.85% | -21.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.93% | -0.85% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.94% | -0.36% | -3.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.92% | -0.11% | -3.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 0.24% | +2.13% |
Volatility
PZT vs. PUSH - Volatility Comparison
Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) has a higher volatility of 1.74% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) at 0.23%. This indicates that PZT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PZT | PUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.74% | 0.23% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | 1.03% | +1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.11% | 1.64% | +5.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.55% | 1.33% | +5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.93% | 1.33% | +5.60% |